Thai O-NET Tests - ภาษาไทย - 2021 ข้อ 36

This question is about identifying which bibliographic entry (บรรณานุกรม/bibliography entry) is incorrectly formatted according to Thai citation standards. I need to analyze each option and identify the incorrect one.

Let's check each option:

Option A: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ :\nสํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร"

This entry includes:

• Author name: สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ
• Year: ๒๕๑๕ (2515 in Thai numerals)
• Title: พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่
• Place: กรุงเทพฯ (Bangkok)
• Publisher: สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร

The formatting appears to be correct with proper punctuation.

Option B: "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย กรุงเทพฯ :\nสํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง"

This entry includes:

• Author name: บรรจบ พันธุเมธา
• Year: ๒๕๓๒ (2532)
• Title: ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย
• Place: กรุงเทพฯ (Bangkok)
• Publisher: สํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง

The formatting appears correct with proper punctuation.

Option C: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์\nมหาวิทยาลัย"

This entry includes:

• Author name: พัทยา สายหู, ดร.
• Year: ๒๕๓๘ (2538)
• Title: กลไกของสังคม
• Place: กรุงเทพฯ (Bangkok)
• Publisher: โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย

I notice there's a double period after "ดร." (Dr.) which might be incorrect: "ดร.." - this could be a formatting error.

Option D: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ\nโรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด"

This entry includes:

• Author name: เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล
• Year: ๒๕๑๘ (2518)
• Title: วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย
• Place: กรุงเทพฯ (Bangkok)
• Publisher: โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด

I notice there's missing punctuation between "กรุงเทพฯ" and "โรงพิมพ์" - usually a colon is needed there. The entry has "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" with no space after the period, which is incorrect.

Option E: "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ\nสํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม"

This entry includes:

• Author name: เรียมเอง (นามแฝง) [pseudonym indicated]
• Year: ๒๕๔๔ (2544)
• Title: เมืองนิมิตร
• Edition: พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓ (3rd edition)
• Place: กรุงเทพฯ (Bangkok)
• Publisher: สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม

I notice there's missing punctuation between "กรุงเทพฯ" and "สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม" - a colon is needed there.

Based on my analysis, both options D and E have formatting issues, but option D appears to have the problem with missing space after a period and missing colon, while option E is just missing a colon. Option C has the double period issue. I'll need to determine which one is considered the most incorrect according to Thai bibliography standards.

In Thai bibliography format, typically:

1. There should be proper spacing between elements
2. A colon should separate the place of publication and publisher
3. Proper punctuation should be used throughout

Looking at all five options again, I believe option D has the most issues because:

• There's no space between the title and the place of publication: "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" (should be "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย. กรุงเทพฯ")
• There's no colon between the place and publisher: "กรุงเทพฯ\nโรงพิมพ์" (should be "กรุงเทพฯ :\nโรงพิมพ์")

Option E has a similar issue with the missing colon. Option C has the double period issue.

I believe option D is the most incorrect, followed by option E, then option C.

Let me take one more careful look:

A: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ :\nสํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร" I notice there's no period after the year ๒๕๑๕, which might be incorrect.

B: "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย กรุงเทพฯ :\nสํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง" This looks correct.

C: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์\nมหาวิทยาลัย" Double period after ดร. is likely incorrect.

D: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ\nโรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด" Missing space after period and missing colon.

E: "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ\nสํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม" Missing colon between place and publisher.

Given these observations, the options with formatting errors are: A: Missing period after year C: Double period after ดร. D: Missing space after title period and missing colon E: Missing colon

Option D appears to have the most issues. So the answer is D.

Let me double-check once more. In standard Thai bibliography format:

1. Author's name should be followed by a period
2. Year should be followed by a period
3. Title should be followed by a period and a space
4. Place of publication should be followed by a colon
5. There should be a space between all major elements

Checking again:

A: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ :\nสํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร"

• Missing period after year ๒๕๑๕
• Should be: สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕. พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ :\nสํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร

B: "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย กรุงเทพฯ :\nสํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง"

• Looks correct

C: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์\nมหาวิทยาลัย"

• Double period after ดร. is incorrect
• Should be: พัทยา สายหู, ดร. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์\nมหาวิทยาลัย

D: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ\nโรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด"

• Missing space after title period
• Missing colon before publisher
• Should be: เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย. กรุงเทพฯ :\nโรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด

E: "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ\nสํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม"

• Missing colon before publisher
• Should be: เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ :\nสํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม

Based on this analysis, options A, C, D, and E all have formatting errors. However, option D has the most issues (two errors).

But I need to be careful about the question: "ข้อใดเขียนบรรณานุกรมไม่ถูกต้อง" (Which item has an incorrect bibliography format?)

Since multiple options have errors, I should pick the one with the most significant formatting problem. Option D has both missing space and missing colon, which makes it the most incorrect.

Therefore, the answer is D.

This is a Thai language question asking which option shows an incorrect bibliography format. Let me examine each option:

a) สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร

• Has author, year, title, place : publisher
• Has a period after year
• Has colon between place and publisher

b) บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง

• Has author, year, title, place : publisher
• Has periods after author and year
• Has colon between place and publisher

c) พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย

• Has author with title (ดร.), year, title, place : publisher
• Has periods after title abbreviation, year, and book title
• Has colon between place and publisher

d) เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด

• Lacks a colon between the place and publisher
• Incorrectly formatted with no separation between location and publishing house

e) เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพ

• Incomplete bibliographic information
• Missing publisher
• Location lacks full specification I notice both options lack the required colon between publication place and publisher. Option d has an additional error of missing a space after the period. While both entries are technically incorrect, I'll focus on the specific formatting requirement of the colon placement. The Thai bibliography standard clearly mandates a colon separating the city and publishing house, which is absent in both entries. I need to carefully compare the two options to determine which most directly violates the bibliographic formatting rule.

This is a Thai language question asking which bibliography entry is written incorrectly. Let me analyze each option:

a) สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร

b) บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง

c) พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย

d) เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด

e) เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม

I notice inconsistent punctuation in the bibliography entries. Most entries follow a standard format with a colon after the city name and a period after the book title. Option d stands out with two significant formatting errors: no colon after กรุงเทพฯ and no period separating the book title from the city name.

This is a Thai language question asking which bibliography entry is written incorrectly. Let me analyze each option:

a) "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร"

• This appears to be about Phra Sunthorn Voharn (Phu), a famous Thai poet
• Format seems standard for Thai bibliography

b) "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง"

• Author name, year, title, place, publisher
• Format looks correct

c) "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย"

• I notice there are two periods after "ดร." which seems incorrect
• Should be "ดร." not "ดร.."

d) "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด"

• Missing colon between place and publisher
• Should be "กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์..."

e) "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม"

• Missing colon between place and publisher

I identify two key formatting errors: option c's double period after "ดร." and option d and e's missing colon between location and publisher.

The standard Thai bibliography format requires a specific structure: Author. Year. Title. Place : Publisher. Both options d and e deviate from this standard by omitting the crucial colon separating the city and publishing house.

The most glaring mistake is the typographical error in option c, where "ดร.." creates an unnecessary and incorrect double period.

First, the question is in Thai: "ข้อใดเขียนบรรณานุกรมไม่ถูกต้อง" which means "Which one has an incorrectly written bibliography?"

I need to check each option for correctness in bibliography formatting. Bibliographies typically follow specific rules for order, punctuation, and presentation of elements like author names, publication years, titles, and publishers.

Let me look at each option:

• Option a: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร"

  • Author: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ." – This seems like an honorific or title. In Thai bibliographies, authors might be listed with titles. But I need to see if the order is correct.

  • Year: "๒๕๑๕" which is 1972 in Buddhist era (BE), common in Thailand.

  • Title: "พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่" – It might be a book title.

  • Publisher: "กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร" – Location and publisher.

  • The format seems okay, but I should check if the author name is properly formatted.

• Option b: "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง"

  • Author: "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา." – Full name, seems fine.

  • Year: "๒๕๓๒" (1989 BE).

  • Title: "ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย"

  • Publisher: "กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง"

  • This looks standard.

• Option c: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย"

  • Author: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.." – There's a double period after "ดร." which might be a typo. "ดร." is likely "Dr." for Doctor, but in bibliography, titles might be included, but the double dot is suspicious.

  • Year: "๒๕๓๘" (1995 BE).

  • Title: "กลไกของสังคม"

  • Publisher: "กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย"

  • The issue might be the "ดร.." with two dots. It should probably be "ดร." without an extra dot. This could be incorrect punctuation.

• Option d: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด"

  • Author: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล." – Fine.

  • Year: "๒๕๑๘" (1975 BE).

  • Title: "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย"

  • Publisher: "กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด" – Notice there's no colon after "กรุงเทพฯ". In standard bibliography, it should be "กรุงเทพฯ : publisher" with a colon. Here, it's missing the colon, so it might be incorrect.

• Option e: "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม"

  • Author: "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง)" which means "pen name". This is acceptable.

  • Year: "๒๕๔๔" (2001 BE).

  • Title: "เมืองนิมิตร"

  • Edition: "พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓" means "3rd edition". This should come after the title but before the publisher.

  • Publisher: "กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม" – Again, no colon after "กรุงเทพฯ". It should have a colon.

Now, comparing all:

• Option a: Has author with title, but seems okay.

• Option b: Looks correct.

• Option c: Has "ดร.." with double dot, which might be a punctuation error.

• Option d: Missing colon after "กรุงเทพฯ".

• Option e: Also missing colon after "กรุงเทพฯ".

In standard Thai bibliography formatting, after the location (e.g., กรุงเทพฯ), there should be a colon before the publisher name.

For option d and e, both are missing the colon.

But the question is to find which one is incorrect, and there might be only one incorrect, or I need to see which has the most obvious error.

Option c has an extra dot in "ดร..", which is likely a typo.

Option d and e lack colons.

In many bibliography styles, the colon is required.

But let's see option e: it has an edition mentioned, which is placed correctly: after title, before publisher. But still missing colon.

Similarly, option d misses colon.

Option a might have an issue with the author name. "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ." – "พระ" might be a title, but it's written with a comma, which could be acceptable.

I recall that in Thai bibliographies, for authors with titles, it might be written that way.

But for option c, the "ดร.." with two dots is probably incorrect.

Also, in option d, "กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์..." no space or colon? It has a space, but no colon.

Standard format is "Location : Publisher".

So missing colon is an error.

Similarly for e.

But perhaps option c has an additional error.

Let me check option a again: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕" – the year is right after the author with a space, but no period after the author? In Thai, sometimes periods are used differently.

In option b, it's "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒." – there's a period after the author name, then space, year, then another period? No, in the text, it's "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศ..." so after author, there's a period, then space, year, then period after year? Year should not have a period after it unless it's the end of a sentence, but in bibliography, years are often followed by a period or not.

In many styles, after the author, there's a period, then the year, then the title, and so on.

For option a: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕" – no period after year, it goes directly to title. But in the text, it's "๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณี..." so no period after year.

Similarly, option b: "๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศ..." has a period after year.

Inconsistency.

I need to know the standard Thai bibliography format.

Upon quick think, in Thai, the common format is: Author. Year. Title. Location: Publisher.

So, after author, period; after year, period; after title, period; then location colon publisher.

For option a: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณี..." – no period after year, so it might be missing a period after the year.

Compare to option b: "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศ..." – has period after year.

Option c: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม." – has period after year and after title.

"ดร.." has two dots, error.

Option d: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์..." – no period after title? "ไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" has a period after "ไทย", but no space before "กรุงเทพฯ"? It's "ไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" which might be a typo, should be "ไทย. กรุงเทพฯ" with space. Also, no colon.

"วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" – the period after "ไทย" might be ending the title, but "กรุงเทพฯ" should be on its own or with colon.

In the text, it's written as "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" which could be interpreted as title having a period, then "กรุงเทพฯ" without space, and no colon.

Definitely error.

Option e: "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม" – has periods after author, year, title, edition, but no colon after "กรุงเทพฯ".

So multiple options have errors.

But the question implies only one is incorrect, or I need to find the most incorrect.

Perhaps option c has the "ดร.." which is clearly a punctuation error.

Option d has "ไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" without space and no colon.

Option e has no colon.

But let's see option a: no period after year.

In option a, "๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณี..." no period after year, while others have.

In standard, year should be followed by a period.

For example, in option b, it has period after year.

So option a might be missing period after year.

Similarly, option d has period after title but no space before publisher location.

Option e has no colon.

But I think the most common error is the missing colon after location.

Upon second thought, in some Thai bibliographies, the colon might be omitted, but it's standard to include it.

I recall that for pen names, it should be handled correctly.

But let's look back at the options.

Perhaps option c is incorrect because of the "ดร.." with double dot.

In option d, "กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์..." no colon, and also "ไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" no space, so it's messy.

Similarly, option e has no colon.

But option a might be correct if "พระ" is part of the name.

I think option d is likely incorrect because of the missing colon and no space.

Let's check the exact text:

For option d: "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด" – the period after "ไทย" is attached to "กรุงเทพฯ", so it's "ไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" which is wrong; it should be "ไทย. กรุงเทพฯ : " with space and colon.

Similarly, option e: "กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม" no colon.

But option e has a space, so it's better, but still no colon.

Option c has "ดร.." which is extra dot.

Perhaps all have issues, but I need to find which one is not correct.

Another thing: in option a, the author is "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ." which might be written as "พระสุนทรโวหาร (ภู่)" or something, but it's listed with comma, which could be acceptable.

I remember that in Thai bibliography, for authors with titles, it's common to write it that way.

But for option c, "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.." – the "ดร." should not have two dots; it should be "ดร." .

So that's clearly an error.

Similarly, in option d and e, missing colon is also error.

But perhaps the question expects option c to be incorrect because of the punctuation.

Let's see the answer choices; I need to choose one.

Perhaps option d is incorrect because it has no colon and the title period is not separated.

In option e, it has "เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ" so after title, period and space, edition, period and space, then location without colon.

Still missing colon.

But in some styles, edition is included correctly.

The colon is missing in d and e.

But for option a, it might be missing period after year.

Let's compare to standard.

I think the most obvious error is in option c with "ดร.." .

Also, in option d, "ไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" no space, so it's worse.

But let's see the response format; I need to output the correct answer key.

Perhaps I can look for the one that doesn't follow the pattern.

Another idea: in option a, the author is written with " (ภู่), พระ." which might be irregular.

But I think option c has a clear typo with double dot.

Upon closer inspection, in option c, it's "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.." – the comma after "สายหู" and then "ดร.." with two dots. It should probably be "พัทยา สายหู, ดร. " with one dot after Dr.

So yes, error.

In option d, "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" – after "ไทย." it should have space, and then "กรุงเทพฯ : " with colon.

No colon and no space.

In option e, "กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม" no colon, but has space.

So option d might be more incorrect because no space after title period.

Similarly, option a has no period after year.

But for option b, it seems correct: "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง" – after year, period and space, title, then space, location colon publisher. It has colon, so good.

Option b has a colon, so it's correct.

Option a: no period after year, and no colon? Let's see: "๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร" – it has colon after "กรุงเทพฯ", so colon is present. But no period after year "๒๕๑๕" should have a period.

In the text, it's "๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณี..." so no period after year, while in b, it's "๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศ..." with period.

So option a is missing period after year.

Option c has "๒๕๓๘. " with period, but "ดร.." error.

Option d has "๒๕๑๘. " with period after year, but title period not spaced and no colon.

Option e has "๒๕๔๔. " with period after year, and title with period and space, edition with period and space, but no colon after location.

So multiple errors.

But perhaps the question is designed to have one with incorrect author format or something.

I think option c might be the intended incorrect one because of the "ดร.." .

Let's see the author in option a: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ." – this might be correct for a historical figure like Sunthorn Phu, who is often referred to as Phra Sunthonwohan.

In Thai, it's common to write it that way.

For option c, "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.." – the "ดร." is probably "Dr.", and it should be written without extra dot.

So I think option c is incorrect.

Also, in option e, the pen name is handled correctly.

So I'll go with option c as incorrect.

But let's confirm with option d: it has "โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด" which might be a publisher, but the format is wrong.

Perhaps all except b have issues, but b seems correct.

Option b looks perfectly correct.

So the incorrect ones are a, c, d, e compared to b.

But the question is "ข้อใดเขียนบรรณานุกรมไม่ถูกต้อง" meaning "which one is incorrect", so I need to find one.

Perhaps option d is incorrect because of the missing colon and no space.

In the list, option d has "ไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" which is clearly a error in typing, no space.

Similarly, option e has space but no colon.

In many cases, the colon is required.

But for the purpose of this, I think option c has an obvious punctuation error with "ดร.." .

Let's see the answer choices; perhaps I can see which one is not standard.

Another thought: in option a, the author name might be written in reverse order or something, but it's common.

I found online that in Thai bibliography, the format is Author. (Year). Title. Publisher location: Publisher.

With periods after author, year, title, and colon after location.

So for option a, missing period after year.

Option c, error in author with "ดร.." .

Option d, missing colon and no space after title period.

Option e, missing colon.

But option e has edition, which is fine.

Perhaps the most severe is option d because "ไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" is run-on.

In option d, it's "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" which means the title ends with "ไทย." and then "กรุงเทพฯ" without space, so it's incorrect.

In option e, "เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ" has spaces, so it's better, just missing colon.

In option c, "ดร.." is small error.

But I think option d might be the answer.

Let's look at the options again in the JSON.

In option d: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด"

Yes, "ไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" no space, and no colon.

In option e: "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม" has "กรุงเทพฯ" with space, but no colon.

So both d and e have no colon, but d has no space after title period.

So d is more incorrect.

Also, in option a, no period after year.

But let's see option c: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย" – it has colon after "กรุงเทพฯ", so colon is present. Only issue is "ดร.." .

So for option c, the publisher part is correct with colon, but author has error.

For option d, both author and year might be correct, but title and publisher are wrong.

So perhaps option d is incorrect.

I think I need to choose one.

Perhaps the correct answer is d because of the missing colon and no space.

Let's see if there's a standard.

I recall that in some Thai bibliography examples, the colon is always used.

So options d and e are incorrect because no colon.

But option e has the edition, which is placed correctly, so it might be only missing colon, while d has multiple errors.

But the question might be expecting option d.

Another idea: in option a, the author is "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ." which might be written as "พระสุนทรโวหาร (ภู่)" without comma, so the comma might be error.

But I think it's acceptable.

Perhaps option c is incorrect because "ดร." should not be listed with comma and dot; it should be part of the name or something.

But in bibliography, it's common to include titles with dots.

The double dot is error.

So for the sake of this, I'll go with option c as incorrect because of "ดร.." .

But let's see the answer.

Perhaps I can think that option e is correct because pen name is handled properly, and only missing colon, but in some styles, colon might be omitted, but I doubt it.

In option b, it has colon, so it should be there.

So all except b have errors, but since it's multiple choice, I need to find the key.

Perhaps the intended answer is d.

Let's look at the year in option a: "๒๕๑๕" which is 1972, and for Sunthorn Phu, he lived in the 19th century, so the year might be wrong, but that's not bibliography format, but content error.

Sunthorn Phu died in 1855, so 1972 is not when he wrote; it might be publication year, which is fine.

So no issue.

I think the bibliography format error is in option d because of the missing space and colon.

In option e, it's "กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม" no colon, but if we consider that, it might be acceptable in some cases, but usually not.

But in option d, "ไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" is definitely wrong.

So I think option d is incorrect.

Similarly, option a has no period after year.

But let's see the response.

Perhaps the correct answer is d.

I'll go with d.

But let's see the options: a, b, c, d, e.

In the JSON, I need to output "correct_answer_key" which is the letter of the correct choice, but the question is to find which is incorrect, so the "correct_answer_key" might be the key for the incorrect one? No, let's read the user message: "respond in JSON with the "correct_answer_key"."

And the "correct_answer_key" is for the correct answer, but the question is "which one is incorrect", so the correct answer key should be the letter of the option that is incorrect.

Let's read the user message: "Given a multiple choice question in JSON format, provide a brief explanation, then respond in JSON with the "correct_answer_key"."

And the question is "ข้อใดเขียนบรรณานุกรมไม่ถูกต้อง" which means "which one has incorrect bibliography", so the correct answer key is the letter of the option that is incorrect.

So I need to find which option is incorrect and output that key.

So for example, if option d is incorrect, I output "d".

Similarly.

So in my explanation, I should say which one is incorrect and why.

So based on analysis, option d has "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" with no space after the title period and no colon before the publisher, which is incorrect formatting.

Option e also has no colon, but has space, so it's less severe, but still error.

Option c has "ดร.." error.

But option d seems more obviously wrong because of the lack of space.

Also, in option a, no period after year.

But let's see option b is correct.

So I think option d is the most incorrect.

Perhaps the answer is d.

I recall that in some sources, for bibliography, the colon is essential.

So options d and e are both incorrect, but since only one choice, perhaps d is chosen.

Another thing: in option e, "พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓." which is edition, should be after title, before publisher, which is correct, so only missing colon.

In option d, no edition, but title and publisher are messed up.

So I think d is incorrect.

I'll go with d.

So the correct answer key is "d".

But let's make sure.

Perhaps option a is incorrect because the author should be "พระสุนทรโวหาร (ภู่)" without comma, or something.

But I think it's fine.

So for the response, I'll say option d is incorrect.

First, the user has provided a multiple-choice question in JSON format, similar to the previous one. It's about identifying which bibliography entry is incorrectly written. The question is in Thai, and all options are in Thai as well.

The question translates to: "Which of the following is an incorrectly written bibliography?"

I need to evaluate each option (a through e) to determine which one does not follow standard bibliography formatting rules. I'm assuming standard Thai or general academic bibliography styles, like those based on APA, MLA, or Thai academic standards.

Let me list out the options:

a: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร"

• This seems to be for a book by Sunthorn Phu. Format: Author (pen name), Year, Title, Place: Publisher.

b: "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง"

• Author. Year. Title. Place: Publisher.

c: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์ มหาวิทยาลัย"

• Author, Dr.. Year. Title. Place: Publisher.

d: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด"

• Author. Year. Title. Place Publisher (no colon after place).

e: "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม"

• Pseudonym. Year. Title. Edition. Place: Publisher.

Common bibliography errors might include:

• Missing punctuation, like colons or periods.

• Incorrect order of elements.

• Typos in formatting, such as extra dots or missing spaces.

Let me check for inconsistencies:

• In option a: It has "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ." which might be author with title or honorific. Then year, title, place: publisher. Seems okay, but the author's name is formatted with a comma.

• Option b: Standard: Author. Year. Title. Place: Publisher.

• Option c: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. " – There's a double period after "ดร..". That looks like a typo; it should be "ดร." with one period.

• Option d: "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์..." – There's no space or colon after the title and before the place. It should probably be "Title. Place: Publisher" but it's "Title.Place Publisher" without separation.

• Option e: Includes edition "พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓." which is fine, and then Place: Publisher, but in the text, it's "กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์..." – Wait, no colon after place.

In standard formats:

• Typically, it's "Place: Publisher."

In option d: "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์..." – No colon, and no space after the period of the title directly to "กรุงเทพฯ".

In option e: "เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์..." – Again, no colon after "กรุงเทพฯ".

But in options a and b, there is a colon: a has "กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์..." and b has the same.

Option c: "กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์..."

So, options d and e are missing the colon after the place.

The question is to find which one is incorrectly written. Possibly more than one, but we need the one that's wrong.

Specifically, option c has "ดร.. " with two periods, which is likely an error.

Option d has no colon and no space: "Title.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์..."

This might be the most glaring error.

I need to pick one. In multiple-choice, only one is correct, meaning only one is incorrect.

Upon closer inspection:

• Option a: Seems correct.

• Option b: Correct.

• Option c: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. " – The double period is probably a typo.

• Option d: Missing colon and proper separation.

• Option e: Also missing colon.

Perhaps the intended incorrect one is option d, as it's the most malformed.

In Thai bibliography, the standard might be specific. From my knowledge, common errors are in punctuation.

Another thought: In option a, the author's name is "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ." which might be incorrect because "พระ" is a title, and it should be properly formatted.

But I think the double period in c is a clear error.

Perhaps the answer is c, due to the double period.

Let's assume that's it.

In my response, I need to provide a brief explanation, then respond in JSON with the "correct_answer_key".

So, for this, I'll say the correct answer is c, because of the double period in "ดร..".

Final decision: c is the one with the error.

First, the user is providing another multiple-choice question in JSON format. I need to follow the same pattern as before: provide a brief explanation, then respond in JSON with the "correct_answer_key".

The question is in Thai: "ข้อใดเขียนบรรณานุกรมไม่ถูกต้อง" which translates to "Which one is written incorrectly in the bibliography?"

I have to evaluate the options a through e, which are bibliographic entries, and determine which one is not correctly formatted according to standard bibliographic rules, likely in Thai or general academic standards.

Let me list out the options:

a: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร"

• This seems to be for a book by Sunthorn Phu. The format is: Author (real name), Year. Title. Place: Publisher.

b: "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง"

• Author. Year. Title. Place: Publisher.

c: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์ มหาวิทยาลัย"

• Author, Dr.. Year. Title. Place: Publisher.

• Note: There's a double dot after ดร., which might be a typo. In Thai, "ดร." means Dr., and it should probably be "ดร." without extra dots.

d: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด"

• Author. Year. Title. Place Publisher – but there's no colon or separator before the publisher. It says "กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์..." which might be missing a colon or proper punctuation.

e: "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม"

• Pseudonym. Year. Title. Edition. Place: Publisher.

Standard bibliographic formats, like APA or Chicago, have specific rules. In Thai academic contexts, they often follow similar rules to international standards.

Common issues to look for:

• Proper author formatting: Last name first, or full name.

• Year placement.

• Title italicized or in quotes (but in text, it's hard to tell).

• Place and publisher separated by a colon.

• Punctuation errors.

Let me check each one more carefully:

a: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร"

• Author is "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ" which might be okay, as it's specifying the pen name and title.

• Seems properly formatted with colon before publisher.

b: Standard: Author. Year. Title. Place: Publisher.

• Looks good.

c: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์ มหาวิทยาลัย"

• The double dot after ดร.. is likely a error. It should be "ดร." not "ดร..". This might be the incorrect one.

d: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด"

• Missing a period or colon after the title and before the place. It should be "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์..." but it's "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" without space or punctuation.

e: Includes edition: "พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓." which is fine, but ensure the rest is correct. It has "กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม" without a colon, similar to d.

In d and e, they might be missing the colon.

Comparing:

• a has ":"

• b has ":"

• c has ":"

• d has no ":" before publisher; it's ".กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์..."

• e has no ":"; it's ". กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์..."

So both d and e are missing the colon.

The question is to find which one is NOT correct, and perhaps only one is intended.

In c, the double dot is a clear error.

Upon closer inspection, c has "ดร..", which is probably a typo for "ดร.", making it incorrect.

d might be incorrect due to missing punctuation.

I need to decide which one is the most incorrect.

Perhaps the standard is that all should have the colon, so both d and e are wrong, but the question likely expects one answer.

Looking back, the original question is "ข้อใดเขียนบรรณานุกรมไม่ถูกต้อง" meaning "Which one is written incorrectly", implying one.

In Thai bibliographic style, the format is often: Author. Year. Title. Place: Publisher.

For c, the extra dot in "ดร.." is an error.

For d, it's missing the space or proper separator: "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" should be "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย. กรุงเทพฯ:"

Similarly for e.

But perhaps c is the one with the most obvious error.

Upon second thought, in the provided text, e has "พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม" which might be acceptable if the edition is part of it, but still missing the colon.

I think the correct answer is c, as per common identifications in such questions.

After a quick mental search, I recall that in some Thai tests, c is often the incorrect one due to the double dot.

So, I'll go with c as the incorrect one.

Therefore, my response: Brief explanation, then JSON with "correct_answer_key": "c"

Okay, let's tackle this question. The user is asking which of the given options has an incorrect bibliography format. The question is in Thai, so I need to make sure I understand each part correctly.

First, I'll recall the standard Thai bibliography format. Typically, it includes the author's name, publication year, title, and publisher, all in specific order and punctuation. Let me go through each option one by one.

Option a: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร". Hmm, the author here is "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ". The title seems to be "พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่". Wait, the year is 2515, followed by the title. But usually, the year comes after the title. Wait, no, actually, in Thai bibliography, the structure is Author. Year. Title. Place: Publisher. So the year should be after the author's name, then the title. Let me check again. The format is: Author. Year. Title. Place: Publisher. So in option a, after the author's name, there's the year ๒๕๑๕, then the title. That seems correct. The colon after Bangkok and the publisher name looks okay. Maybe the space between the year and the title? Let me see. The example might have a missing period after the year. Wait, in option a, after the year ๒๕๑๕, there's a space and then the title. Normally, there should be a period after the year. So maybe that's an error here. But I need to check other options too.

Option b: "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง". Here, the author is "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา", year 2532 with a period after, then the title "ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย", followed by place and publisher. This looks correct. The punctuation and order seem right.

Option c: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย". The author here is "พัทยา สายหู, ดร..". Wait, there are two periods after ดร. That might be a typo. It should be "พัทยา สายหู, ดร." with one period. Also, the title is "กลไกของสังคม", then place and publisher. The double period after ดร. is incorrect. That's a possible error here.

Option d: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด". Here, after the title "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย", there's no space before "กรุงเทพฯ". It should have a space between the title and the place. Also, the colon after the place is missing? Wait, the structure is "Place: Publisher". In this case, after Bangkok, it's "โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์..." without a colon. That's an error. So the correct format should have a colon after the place. So this option is missing the colon between place and publisher. That's another mistake.

Option e: "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม". The author is using a pseudonym, which is noted in parentheses. The year is correct. The title is there, then "พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓" which indicates the 3rd edition. Then place and publisher. However, between the edition and the place, there should be a period and space. Also, the place and publisher are separated by a space instead of a colon. So "กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์..." should have a colon after Bangkok. So that's another error.

Now, looking back at each option's issues:

Option a: The year is followed by a space and title, but should there be a period after the year? Let me confirm the standard. In Thai bibliography, after the year, there should be a period and then the title. So in option a, it's "๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณี..." which lacks the period after the year. That's an error.

Option c has two periods after "ดร." which is incorrect.

Option d is missing the colon between place and publisher.

Option e also missing the colon between place and publisher and has a space instead.

So the question is which one is the incorrect one. The question says "ข้อใดเขียนบรรณานุกรมไม่ถูกต้อง" (which one is written incorrectly). There might be multiple errors, but the question expects one correct answer.

Looking again:

Option a: Missing period after year. So the correct format would be "๒๕๑๕. พระอภัยมณี..." but here it's "๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณี...", so that's an error.

Option c: The author's name has "ดร.." with two periods. It should be "ดร." with one period. So that's an error.

Option d: Missing colon between place and publisher. Should be "กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์..." but it's "กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์...", so error.

Option e: Same as d, missing colon and also the edition is placed before the place? Wait, the edition should be after the title but before the place? Let me check. The standard is: Author. Year. Title. Edition. Place: Publisher. So in option e, it's "เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์..." which is correct in placing the edition after the title. But the colon is missing between place and publisher. So that's an error.

Now, which of these options is the incorrect one? The question is asking for the one that's written incorrectly. Since multiple might have errors, but the options are a to e, and the user expects one correct answer.

Looking back at the options again:

Option a's error is missing period after year. So the structure is Author. Year Title... which is wrong because after the year should be a period and then the title.

Option c's error is the double period after ดร. So "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.." which is incorrect. It should be "พัทยา สายหู, ดร." with one period.

Option d's error is missing colon between place and publisher.

Option e's error is missing colon and space instead.

Now, which of these is the most incorrect? The question might have only one correct answer. Let me see the options again.

The question is in Thai, so maybe the standard is stricter. Let me think of each option's correctness:

Option a: The author is "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ." which is correct (the author's name with a title in parentheses). The year is 2515, but after the year, there should be a period before the title. So "๒๕๑๕. พระอภัยมณี..." but here it's written without the period. So that's an error.

Option c: The author is "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.." with two periods. That's definitely wrong. The correct is one period after ดร.

Option d: Missing colon between place and publisher. That's a formatting error.

Option e: Missing colon between place and publisher, and the publisher is connected with a space. Also, the edition is correctly placed.

Now, which of these is the most incorrect? The question might have only one correct answer. Let me check standard Thai bibliography rules again.

In Thai bibliography, the structure is:

ผู้แต่ง. (ปีพิมพ์). ชื่อเรื่อง. สถานที่: สำนักพิมพ์.

So after the year, there must be a period, then the title, then a period, then place and publisher separated by a colon.

Looking at option a:

สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร

Here, after the year ๒๕๑๕, there's no period before the title. So the title starts right after the year without a period. That's incorrect. The correct should have a period after the year.

Option c's error is the double period after ดร. which is a typo. So "ดร.." instead of "ดร.".

Option d and e both missing the colon between place and publisher. So their format is "กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์..." instead of "กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์...".

Now, which of these options is the one that's incorrect? The question is asking for the one that's written incorrectly. Since multiple might have errors, but the options are given, perhaps only one is the correct answer.

Looking at the options again, maybe the most obvious error is in option c with the double period. Alternatively, option a's missing period after the year is a structural error.

Alternatively, maybe option d and e also have errors, but the question might have only one correct answer. Let me see the options again.

Wait, the user's question is in Thai, so maybe the standard is that the colon is mandatory. So options d and e are incorrect because they lack the colon. But the question is asking for which one is incorrect. Since there are multiple, but the options are given, perhaps the answer is option c because of the double period after the title, which is a more obvious mistake.

Alternatively, maybe option a's missing period after the year is the key error. Let me check an example of correct Thai bibliography.

Example:

สมชาย ใจดี. (2550). หนังสือดี. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์ดี.

So in option a, after the year 2515, there should be a period before the title. Without it, it's incorrect. So option a is wrong.

Option c's author has "ดร.." which is two periods. That's a typo, so that's also wrong.

But the question is asking for which one is incorrect. Since the options are a to e, and the user expects one answer, perhaps the intended answer is option c because of the double period after the academic title. Alternatively, maybe option a is the correct answer.

Alternatively, maybe option d is incorrect because the title and place are run together without a space. Wait, in option d: "วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" – there's no space between the title and the place. That's another error. So the title ends with a period, then immediately the place starts. That's incorrect; there should be a space. So that's another error in d.

Hmm, this is getting complicated. Let me try to prioritize which error is the most critical.

The question is about the bibliography format. The key elements are:

1. Author's name correctly formatted (including titles like ดร. with one period)
2. Year followed by a period and then title
3. Title followed by a period, then place and publisher separated by a colon.

Looking at each option:

Option a: Missing period after year → error in structure.

Option c: Double period after ดร. → formatting error in author's name.

Option d: Missing colon between place and publisher, and no space after title → two errors.

Option e: Missing colon between place and publisher → error.

So the question is which of these is the incorrect one. Since the question is asking for the one that's written incorrectly, and there might be multiple, but the options are given, perhaps the most incorrect is option c because of the double period in the author's name, which is a clear typo. Alternatively, option a's missing period after the year is a structural error.

Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c because the author's name is written as "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.." with two periods. That's definitely wrong. The correct should be "พัทยา สายหู, ดร." with one period. So that's an obvious mistake.

Alternatively, maybe option d is incorrect because it's missing the colon and has no space after the title. But the question might consider the colon as the main issue.

Alternatively, looking at the options again, perhaps the answer is option c. Let me check the options again.

Wait, in option a, the author is "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ." which is correct. The parentheses around ภู่ indicate the pen name or alternative name. The period after พระ is correct. Then the year is 2515 followed by the title without a period. That's the error here.

Option c's author has "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.." which is two periods after ดร. So that's a typo. So that's an error in the author's name formatting.

Between a and c, which is more incorrect? The question is about the bibliography format. The missing period after the year in a is a structural error in the format, whereas the double period in c is a typo in the author's name. Both are errors, but perhaps the question considers the structural format (year followed by period) as more critical.

Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c because the author's name is written with "ดร.." which is incorrect. The user might have intended that as the error.

Alternatively, looking at the options again, maybe option d is the answer because it's missing the colon and has no space between title and place. Let me see:

Option d: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯโรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด"

Here, after the title's period, there's no space before กรุงเทพฯ, so it's "ไทย.กรุงเทพฯ" which is incorrect. Also, the publisher is directly after without a colon. So two errors here.

Option e: "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔๔. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม"

Here, after the place, there's a space instead of a colon. So "กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์..." which is wrong. The colon is missing.

Now, the question is which of these options is the incorrect one. Since the user provided the options, and the answer is one of them, perhaps the most obvious is option c because of the double period after ดร. which is a clear mistake in the author's name formatting. Alternatively, maybe the answer is option a because of the missing period after the year.

Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Let me think again.

In Thai bibliography, the author's academic title like ดร. should be followed by a single period. So "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.." is incorrect. That's a clear error. So option c is wrong.

Option a's error is also an error, but perhaps the question considers the author's name error as more critical. Alternatively, maybe the answer is option a.

Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option d because it's missing both the space and the colon. But I'm not sure.

Alternatively, looking at the options again, perhaps the answer is option c. Let me check the options once more.

Wait, in option a, the title is "พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่". The author is "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ." which is correct. The year is 2515 followed by the title without a period. So the structure is:

Author. Year Title. Place: Publisher.

But the correct should be:

Author. Year. Title. Place: Publisher.

So the missing period after the year is an error. That's a formatting mistake.

Option c's error is in the author's name. So both a and c have errors. But the question is asking for which one is incorrect. Since the options are given, maybe the intended answer is option c because the author's name is written incorrectly with two periods. That's a more obvious typo.

Alternatively, maybe the answer is option a. I'm a bit confused here. Let me see if there's any other clues.

Wait, in option d, the publisher is "โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด" which might be the name of the printer, but the format requires a colon between place and publisher. So missing colon is an error.

Option e also missing colon.

The question is asking for the one that is written incorrectly. Since multiple options have errors, but the user expects one answer, perhaps the most incorrect is option c because of the double period in the author's name. Alternatively, maybe the answer is option a.

Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Let me think of standard examples again.

In the example I found earlier:

ผู้แต่ง. (ปีพิมพ์). ชื่อเรื่อง. สถานที่: สำนักพิมพ์.

So the year must have a period after. So option a is wrong because it's missing that.

Option c's author has two periods after ดร. which is incorrect.

So both a and c are wrong, but the options are given, so perhaps the answer is option c. Alternatively, maybe the question considers the missing period after the year as the main error, so the answer is a.

Hmm, this is tricky. Since I have to choose one, I'll go with option c because the double period after the academic title is a clear formatting mistake, whereas the missing period after the year might be a common oversight but still an error. However, maybe the question's intended answer is option c.

Alright! Let's tackle this question about identifying the incorrect book reference. The user provided five options in Thai, each presenting a different citation style. I need to figure out which one doesn't follow proper Thai academic formatting.

First, I recall that in Thai academic citations, the year is typically written in Buddhist Era (B.E.), which is 543 years ahead of the Common Era (C.E.). So, for example, 2023 C.E. is 2566 B.E. The format usually includes the author's name, followed by the year in B.E., the title, edition if any, place of publication, and the publisher, separated by colons.

Looking at each option:

Option A: "สุนทรโวหาร (ภู่), พระ. ๒๕๑๕ พระอภัยมณีคำกลอนของสุนทรภู่ กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์บรรณาคาร"

• The year is 2515 B.E., which is correct. The structure seems right: author, year, title, place, publisher.

Option B: "บรรจบ พันธุเมธา. ๒๕๓๒. ภาษาต่างประเทศในภาษาไทย กรุงเทพฯ : สํานักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง"

• Here, the year is 2532 B.E. The format looks good: author, year, title, place, publisher.

Option C: "พัทยา สายหู, ดร.. ๒๕๓๘. กลไกของสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์ มหาวิทยาลัย"

• The year is 2538 B.E. The structure is correct, including the academic title "ดร." after the name.

Option D: "เบ็ญจวรรณ สุนทรากูล. ๒๕๑๘. วิวัฒนาการของแบบเรียนไทย.กรุงเทพฯ โรงพิมพ์สถานสงเคราะห์หญิงปากเกร็ด"

• The year is 2518 B.E. However, I notice there's no colon after "กรุงเทพฯ". In proper formatting, there should be a colon between the place and the publisher. This seems like an error.

Option E: "เรียมเอง (นามแฝง). ๒๕๔ไ. เมืองนิมิตร. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๓. กรุงเทพฯ สํานักพิมพ์กระท่อม"

• The year is 2544 B.E. The format includes the edition, which is appropriate. The structure appears correct.

So, the incorrect one is Option D because it lacks the colon between the place and the publisher.