With answers from 68 AI models.
          
            
ตัวเลือกใดต่อไปนี้ทีผู้ทําหน้าทีติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฎิบัติได้
Using dataset from ThaiExam Dataset.
ในการพิจารณาหน้าที่ที่ถูกต้องของผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน:
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
This question asks about which of the following actions an investment contact person can legally perform.
Let me analyze each option:
A: Encouraging or advising investors in a way that supports frequent trading transactions - This is not appropriate as it may lead to churning (excessive trading).
B: Being authorized by investors to make securities trading decisions on their behalf - This would constitute discretionary trading, which is typically not allowed for investment contact persons.
C: Providing advice on securities trading that are offered to the public that their company is distributing within 5 business days after the closing date of the sale - This appears to be a permissible activity within the proper timeframe.
D: Supporting or assisting investors by providing informal loan sources for securities trading - This is inappropriate as it could lead to unregulated financing for securities trading.
Based on regulatory standards for investment professionals, option C appears to be the only appropriate action.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
Let me translate the question and answer options from Thai to English first to better understand the content:
Question: "Which of the following can an investor contact officer perform?"
Options: a) "Persuade or give advice in a way that encourages investors to make frequent transactions" b) "Accept assignments from investors to make securities trading decisions on behalf of investors" c) "Provide advice on trading securities offered to the public that the company they are affiliated with is the distributor within 5 business days after the closing date of the sale" d) "Support or assist investors by providing informal lending sources for securities trading"
Now, let me analyze each option to determine which activity an investor contact officer can legally perform:
a) "Persuade or give advice in a way that encourages investors to make frequent transactions" - This sounds like churning, which is an unethical practice where brokers encourage excessive trading to generate commissions. This would typically not be allowed.
b) "Accept assignments from investors to make securities trading decisions on behalf of investors" - This describes discretionary trading authority, which requires specific licenses and authorizations. A basic investor contact officer typically cannot make trading decisions on behalf of clients without proper authorization.
c) "Provide advice on trading securities offered to the public that the company they are affiliated with is the distributor within 5 business days after the closing date of the sale" - This seems to be related to providing advice after a distribution period has ended. This might be permissible depending on regulatory rules.
d) "Support or assist investors by providing informal lending sources for securities trading" - Arranging informal (outside the system) loans for securities trading would generally be prohibited as it could lead to financial instability and regulatory issues.
Based on my understanding of financial regulations, option C seems most likely to be permissible. After a distribution period has ended (the 5-day period mentioned), the investor contact officer can provide advice on those securities. The other options describe activities that would typically be prohibited under securities regulations.
Therefore, the correct answer is likely C.
This question asks about what investment contact officers are allowed to do.
Option A involves encouraging frequent transactions (churning), which is unethical and prohibited.
Option B describes making trading decisions on behalf of investors, which requires specific authorization beyond a contact officer's role.
Option C involves providing advice about securities that the officer's company distributed, but only after the 5-day closing period has passed, which is typically allowed under regulations.
Option D describes arranging informal loans for securities trading, which is prohibited under financial regulations.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ให้ฉันวิเคราะห์ตัวเลือกแต่ละข้อเกี่ยวกับสิ่งที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน (Investor Relations) สามารถปฏิบัติได้:
a) ชักชวนให้ทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครั้ง - นี่คือการ churning ซึ่งผิดจรรยาบรรณ b) รับมอบหมายตัดสินใจซื้อขายแทน - นี่เกินขอบเขตหน้าที่ IR ซึ่งไม่ใช่ผู้จัดการกองทุน c) ให้คำแนะนำหลักทรัพย์ที่บริษัทเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายหลังปิดการขาย 5 วัน - นี่คือช่วง quiet period ที่ยังมีข้อจำกัด แต่เป็นสิ่งที่ทำได้ภายใต้กฎระเบียบ d) จัดหาเงินกู้นอกระบบ - นี่ผิดกฎหมายอย่างชัดเจน
ตัวเลือก c น่าจะถูกต้องที่สุด เพราะเป็นการปฏิบัติที่อนุญาตได้หลังจากช่วง quiet period ผ่านไป
{"correct_answer_key": "c"}
This is a Thai language question about what investor relations officers can do. Let me translate and understand each option:
The question asks: "Which of the following options can an investor relations officer practice/do?"
a) "Persuade or give advice in a manner that encourages investors to make frequent transactions" b) "Accept delegation from investors to make decisions on buying and selling securities on behalf of investors" c) "Give advice on buying and selling securities offered to the general public that the company they belong to is a distributor during the 5 business days after the closing date" d) "Support or assist investors by providing non-system loan sources for use in securities trading"
Looking at these options:
Actually, looking more carefully, all of these seem to be practices that would NOT be allowed for investor relations officers. The question might be asking which one IS allowed.
Option c) mentions giving advice on securities that their company is distributing, but with a 5-day cooling-off period after the sale closes. This might be the most acceptable option as it includes a time restriction to avoid conflicts of interest.
The other options all involve clearly problematic behaviors:
So option c) appears to be the correct answer.
Looking at this question about what investor relations officers are permitted to do:
Option A involves encouraging frequent trading (churning), which is unethical and prohibited.
Option B involves making trading decisions on behalf of investors without proper authorization, which exceeds the scope of an investor relations role.
Option C refers to providing advice on securities that their company distributes, but only after a 5-business-day cooling-off period following the sale closing. This includes a proper waiting period to avoid conflicts of interest.
Option D involves arranging unofficial/non-system loans for securities trading, which is clearly inappropriate and potentially illegal.
Option C is the only practice that could be acceptable as it includes appropriate timing restrictions to manage conflicts of interest.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ให้ฉันวิเคราะห์ตัวเลือกแต่ละข้อ:
a) ชักชวนให้ทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครั้ง - นี่คือการ churning ซึ่งผิดจรรยาบรรณ b) รับมอบหมายตัดสินใจแทนผู้ลงทุน - ผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนไม่มีอำนาจทำหน้าที่นี้ c) ให้คำแนะนำหลักทรัพย์ที่บริษัทเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายหลังปิดการขาย 5 วันทำการ - นี่คือการปฏิบัติที่ถูกต้องตามหลักเกณฑ์ quiet period d) จัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบ - นี่เป็นการกระทำที่ผิดกฎหมาย
ดังนั้น ตัวเลือก c คือสิ่งที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฏิบัติได้
{"correct_answer_key": "c"}
This is a Thai language multiple choice question. Let me translate and understand it:
The question is asking: "Which of the following options can an investor relations officer (IR) practice/do?"
Let me translate each option: a) "Persuade or give advice in a manner that encourages investors to make frequent transactions" b) "Accept assignments from investors to make decisions on buying and selling securities on behalf of investors" c) "Give advice on buying and selling securities offered to the public at large that the company they work for is the distributor during the 5 business days after the closing date" d) "Support or assist investors by providing non-system loan sources for use in securities trading"
This appears to be a question about proper conduct and regulations for investor relations officers in Thailand.
Looking at each option: a) Encouraging frequent transactions (churning) is typically prohibited as it's not in the investor's best interest b) Making investment decisions on behalf of investors would require special licensing/authorization c) There's usually a quiet period after IPOs where those involved in distribution shouldn't promote the securities d) Helping investors get loans outside the system for securities trading would be highly inappropriate and likely illegal
Wait, I need to reconsider. The question asks what an IR officer CAN do, not what they cannot do. Let me re-examine.
Actually, looking more carefully at option c), it mentions giving advice on securities "during the 5 business days after the closing date" when their company is the distributor. This sounds like it might be describing a cooling-off period where they should NOT give advice.
Hmm, all of these options seem like things an IR officer should NOT do. Let me reconsider the question again.
The question asks "ตัวเลือกใดต่อไปนี้ที่ผู้ทําหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฎิบัติได้" which means "Which of the following options can an investor relations officer practice/do?"
I'm puzzled by the options, as they all appear to be prohibited activities. I need to carefully analyze the specific wording of option c) to understand its true meaning.
The Thai regulatory context suggests strict rules for investor relations officers during post-offering periods. Each option seems to involve potential ethical or legal violations that would be inappropriate for a professional in this role.
I'll need to look deeper into the nuanced interpretation of these restrictions, considering the specific five-day window mentioned and the potential exceptions to standard quiet period regulations.
The language implies a precise timeframe where certain professional activities are clearly constrained, requiring careful analysis of what might be permissible versus prohibited.
I'm uncertain about the definitive interpretation, but the Thai text suggests strict limitations on IR officer actions during a specific post-offering window. While all options appear potentially problematic, the question demands identifying one permissible action.
My initial assessment suggests option c) might represent the most likely acceptable scenario, though this feels counterintuitive to standard securities regulatory practices. The nuanced language requires deep understanding of Thai financial regulations.
The fundamental challenge is determining which specific action could be legally sanctioned during this sensitive post-distribution period, despite the seemingly restrictive context.
I'm cautious about these potential activities, but the regulatory landscape suggests most are restricted. While option c) about guidance during quiet periods seems marginally less problematic, I can't definitively confirm its permissibility without deep knowledge of Thai securities regulations. The key challenge is identifying what an IR officer can legally do within strict compliance boundaries.
Looking at this Thai language question about what an investor relations (IR) officer is permitted to do:
The options describe: a) Encouraging frequent trading (churning) b) Making investment decisions on behalf of investors c) Giving advice on publicly offered securities distributed by their company during the 5 business days after sale closing d) Helping investors obtain unofficial loans for securities trading
Options a, b, and d are clearly prohibited activities - churning is unethical, making investment decisions requires special licensing, and facilitating unofficial loans is inappropriate.
Option c appears to describe activity during a typical "quiet period" after a securities offering, which would normally be restricted. However, given that the question asks what an IR officer CAN do (not cannot do), and this is the least problematic option among clearly prohibited activities, this may be the intended answer under specific Thai securities regulations.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
This question is asking about what actions an investor relations officer (or investment advisor) is permitted to do according to Thai securities regulations.
Let me analyze each option:
a) Encouraging frequent trading - This is typically prohibited as it may not be in the client's best interest b) Making investment decisions on behalf of investors - This requires special authorization and licensing c) Providing advice on securities offered to the public that their company underwrites, 5 days after the sale period ends - This appears to be permissible as it's after the restricted period d) Helping investors obtain loans from informal sources for securities trading - This is prohibited and risky
Option C appears to be the only permissible action, as it involves providing advice after the restricted period (during underwriting) has ended.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
This is a multiple choice question in Thai about what investment contact representatives/advisors can do. Let me translate and analyze each option:
Question: "Which of the following options can investment contact representatives/advisors practice?"
a) "Persuade or give advice in a manner that encourages investors to trade frequently"
b) "Accept delegation from investors to make buy/sell securities decisions on behalf of investors"
c) "Give advice on buying/selling securities offered to the general public where their company is the underwriter during the 5 business days after the sale closing date"
d) "Support or assist investors by arranging informal lending sources for use in securities trading"
Based on securities regulations principles, option C seems to be the most reasonable and allowable practice. Options A, B, and D all involve practices that would typically be prohibited or require special authorization.
Option C is about providing advice after the offering period is closed (5 business days after), which would avoid the conflict of interest that would exist during the active selling period.
This question is about what investment contact representatives are permitted to do under securities regulations. Let me analyze each option:
a) Encouraging frequent trading is generally prohibited as it may not serve the investor's best interests
b) Making investment decisions on behalf of clients typically requires special authorization beyond basic representative duties
c) Providing advice on securities after the offering period (5 business days post-closing) is permissible as it avoids conflicts during active sales
d) Arranging informal lending sources is prohibited due to regulatory and risk concerns
Option C is the only practice that aligns with proper regulatory compliance for investment contact representatives.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
The question is about the actions that a licensed investment advisor can legally perform. Let's analyze each option:
Correct Answer:
{"correct_answer_key":"b"}
This question asks which of the given options is an acceptable practice for someone whose role involves investor relations (ผู้ทําหน้าทีติดต่อผู้ลงทุน). The correct answer is the one that aligns with ethical and regulatory standards for investor communication, avoiding conflicts of interest, market manipulation, or unauthorized actions.
None of the options describe acceptable practices, but if forced to choose the "least bad" or a plausible scenario (assuming the question expects one), option (b) might be contextually acceptable only if the person is explicitly authorized (e.g., a discretionary account manager). However, the question seems designed to highlight violations, so this is likely a trick question where all options are incorrect.
If the question expects a correct answer, it may be poorly framed. Assuming standard securities regulations (e.g., Thailand’s SEC), all options are violations. If you must select one, clarify with the exam source.
{"correct_answer_key": null, "comment": "All options violate standard investor relations ethics or regulations."}
(Note: If this is from a test, verify the intended answer with the source material, as the question may contain errors.)
Based on the question, which asks which option is an action that a person responsible for investor contact can perform, the correct answer is option C. This is because providing advice on securities that are being offered to the public, which their affiliated company is distributing after the closing of the sale, is a standard and permissible practice for investor relations personnel, as long as it complies with regulations. The other options involve prohibited activities such as frequent trading encouragement (churning), accepting discretionary trading authority, and facilitating unregulated loans for trading, which are unethical and illegal.
{"correct_answer_key": "c"}
The question asks which of the given options an investor contact person (such as a broker or financial advisor) is permitted to perform under typical securities regulations. The key is to identify the option that aligns with legal and ethical standards, avoiding prohibited practices like churning, conflicts of interest, or unregulated activities.
Thus, option b is the correct choice, as discretionary trading with client authorization is a standard and allowable practice when properly executed.
{"correct_answer_key":"b"}
First, the question is in Thai: "ตัวเลือกใดต่อไปนี้ที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฏิบัติได้" which translates to "Which of the following options can an investor contact person perform?"
The options are:
a: "ชักชวน หรือให้คำแนะนำในลักษณะที่เป็นการสนับสนุนให้ผู้ลงทุนทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครั้ง" – This means "Encourage or advise in a way that supports investors to make frequent transactions."
b: "รับมอบหมายจากผู้ลงทุนในการตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนผู้ลงทุน" – "Accept assignment from investors to make securities trading decisions on behalf of investors."
c: "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย" – "Provide advice on securities trading that is offered to the public widely, which the company one is affiliated with is the distributor, within 5 business days after the closing date of sale."
d: "สนับสนุนหรือให้ความช่วยเหลือผู้ลงทุนโดยการจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบให้เพื่อใช้ในการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์" – "Support or assist investors by providing sources of informal loans for use in securities trading."
I need to determine which of these is permissible for someone who contacts investors. This seems related to securities regulations or ethical guidelines for financial advisors.
From my knowledge of financial regulations, such as those from the SEC or similar bodies, there are rules about what investment advisors or brokers can do. For example:
They shouldn't encourage excessive trading (churning), which is option a.
They typically shouldn't make decisions on behalf of clients without proper authorization, but in some cases, with discretion, it might be allowed, but it's regulated. Option b sounds like accepting discretionary authority, which might be possible with proper consent, but it could be restricted.
Option c involves advising on securities that their own firm is distributing shortly after the sale period. This might be a conflict of interest or subject to cooling-off periods. In many jurisdictions, there are rules against touting or promoting securities immediately after issuance.
Option d involves arranging informal loans for trading, which could be risky and is often prohibited because it might lead to leverage issues or unregulated lending.
I recall that in Thailand, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has regulations. For instance, under the SEC Act or related rules, certain behaviors are prohibited.
Specifically, I think that investment advisors are not allowed to:
Encourage frequent trading for the sake of commissions (churning).
Accept discretionary trading without proper authorization and disclosure.
Promote securities that their firm is involved in without proper disclosures or during blackout periods.
Provide or arrange informal loans for trading, as it might violate margin rules or lead to unethical practices.
Option c mentions advising within 5 days after the closing of sale for securities distributed by their firm. This sounds like a potential conflict, and there might be restrictions on such activities to prevent insider trading or unfair promotion.
Upon second thought, in many regulatory frameworks, there are quiet periods or restrictions on promoting securities immediately after offerings.
But I need to find which one is allowed. The question asks which can be performed, implying that only one is permissible, and the others are not.
Let me think about standard practices:
a: Encouraging frequent transactions is generally prohibited as it can be churning.
b: Making decisions on behalf of investors might be allowed with written discretion, but it's regulated. However, the phrase "รับมอบหมาย" means accepting assignment, which could imply discretion, but it might be permissible with proper procedures.
c: Advising on recently distributed securities by their own firm might be restricted during a certain period to avoid conflicts.
d: Arranging informal loans is likely prohibited as it could be unregulated and risky.
Perhaps option b is allowed if done properly with authorization.
But let's consider the context. The question is about "ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน" which might refer to a salesperson or investment advisor.
In Thai SEC rules, I recall that there are specific prohibitions.
For example, under the SEC Notification or Act, certain actions are not allowed.
I remember that investment advisors cannot accept orders without proper consent, but discretion might be allowed with power of attorney.
But option b says "ตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนผู้ลงทุน" which means making trading decisions instead of investors, which sounds like discretionary trading.
In many cases, discretionary accounts are permitted but highly regulated.
Now, looking at option c: advising within 5 days after closing. This might refer to a cooling-off period where promoting the securities is prohibited to prevent pressure on investors.
In fact, in some regulations, there is a lock-up period or quiet period after IPOs where insiders cannot promote the stock.
Option d is clearly bad; arranging informal loans is likely illegal.
Option a is churning, prohibited.
So, perhaps b is the one that can be done with proper authorization.
But let's see the options again. The question is multiple choice, and I need to pick the correct one that can be performed.
Perhaps none are allowed, but that can't be since it's multiple choice.
Maybe c is allowed or not.
I should think about common sense.
Perhaps in Thai SEC rules, there is a specific rule about this.
I recall that for securities personnel, they are not allowed to provide advice on securities that their firm is distributing during the distribution period or shortly after.
For example, in the U.S., there are rules like FINRA prohibiting certain activities.
But for Thailand, I need to infer.
Option c has "ในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย" which is within 5 business days after closing date of sale. This might be a prohibited period.
In fact, in some jurisdictions, there is a waiting period before analysts can report on newly issued securities.
So, c might not be allowed.
Option d: arranging informal loans – definitely not allowed.
Option a: encouraging frequent transactions – not allowed.
So, by process of elimination, b might be allowed if done with proper procedures.
But the option b says "รับมอบหมาย" which means accepting assignment, and "ตัดสินใจซื้อขายแทน" which means deciding trade instead. This could be discretionary trading, which is permitted with written authorization.
In contrast, the others are clearly violations.
Therefore, b is probably the correct answer.
But let's confirm the translation.
b: "รับมอบหมายจากผู้ลงทุนในการตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนผู้ลงทุน" – "Accept assignment from investors to make securities trading decisions on behalf of investors."
Yes, this sounds like discretionary authority, which is possible.
Whereas a, c, d seem unethical or illegal.
So, I think b is the answer.
Based on securities regulations, such as those from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in Thailand, an investor contact person (e.g., a financial advisor or broker) is generally prohibited from engaging in activities that encourage excessive trading, involve conflicts of interest, or provide unregulated financial assistance.
Thus, the correct answer is option b.
{"correct_answer_key":"b"}
This question, written in Thai, asks which of the following actions a person acting as an investor relations officer can perform. Let's break down the options and then provide the answer.
Therefore, the correct answer is C.
{"correct_answer_key": "c"}
The question asks which of the following actions a person in charge of contacting investors can perform. Let's analyze the options:
None of the options seem like something a contact person can do. However, the question asks which one they can do, implying there is one that is less wrong than the others. Options a, c, and d are clearly unethical or illegal. Option b, while requiring specific licensing, is possible if the contact person has the appropriate authorization. Therefore, option b is the least incorrect.
{"correct_answer_key":"b"}
The question asks which actions a contact person for investors can perform. Let's analyze each option:
None of the options are appropriate. However, the question is poorly worded. Assuming the question is asking what a contact person cannot do, the best answer would be the one that is most clearly prohibited.
{"correct_answer_key":"b"}
คำถามถามว่าตัวเลือกใดที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฏิบัติได้
ดังนั้น ตัวเลือกเดียวที่สามารถปฏิบัติได้ภายใต้เงื่อนไขและใบอนุญาตที่ถูกต้องคือข้อ b.
{"correct_answer_key":"b"}
The question asks which of the following actions a person acting as an investment contact (ผู้ทําหน้าทีติดต่อผู้ลงทุน) can perform. Let's analyze each option:
Upon re-evaluating the options, there seems to be an issue as none of the provided options appear to be a permissible action for an investment contact person under standard financial regulations. However, in a multiple-choice context, sometimes one option is "less wrong" or there might be a specific nuance intended by the question setter.
Let's re-examine the options with a very strict interpretation of what an "investment contact" (ผู้ทําหน้าทีติดต่อผู้ลงทุน) can do, which is primarily to facilitate communication and provide factual information, not to give specific advice that could lead to the issues described in a, b, c, or d.
If this question is from a specific regulatory exam, there might be a very subtle distinction. However, based on general principles:
Let's assume there might be a misunderstanding of the question or options, or a specific context. If we are forced to choose the "least wrong" or something that could be interpreted as a function, it's difficult.
However, let's consider the possibility that the question is poorly phrased or there's a specific regulatory nuance. If we consider the core function of an "investment contact," it is to contact investors and provide information.
Let's re-evaluate option C. While there's a quiet period, the general act of "giving advice on trading securities" is part of what an investment contact might do, even if restricted in specific circumstances. The other options (a, b, d) describe actions that are fundamentally unethical or illegal regardless of the circumstances.
If the question implies "which of these types of activities might they engage in, even if restricted at times," then C is the only one that describes an activity related to providing information/advice about securities, rather than outright illegal/unethical practices.
However, if the question is "which can they legally perform," then none of them are clearly permissible as stated.
Let's assume there's a typo or a specific context where one of these is considered permissible. In the context of Thai regulations (which "ผู้ทําหน้าทีติดต่อผู้ลงทุน" suggests), the role is often about providing information and facilitating transactions, not giving investment advice in the same way an investment advisor would.
Let's reconsider the options from the perspective of what is absolutely forbidden vs. what might be a restricted activity. a, b, d are absolutely forbidden. c is an activity that is restricted during a specific period. An investment contact can give advice on trading securities, just not these specific securities during this specific period.
Therefore, if forced to choose the "most plausible" or "least incorrect" option, it would be 'c' because it describes an activity (giving advice on trading securities) that is generally within the scope of an investment contact's role, even if there are specific blackout periods. The other options describe actions that are fundamentally unethical or illegal and are never permissible.
Final check: The question asks what they can do. If they cannot do it during the 5-day period, then option C is also something they cannot do in that specific circumstance. This makes the question very tricky if all options describe prohibited actions.
However, if we interpret "can perform" as "which of these types of activities are they involved in, even if with restrictions," then C is the only one that isn't outright illegal or unethical in its core nature.
Let's assume there's a nuance in the Thai regulation or the question's intent. Often, questions like this test the knowledge of specific prohibitions. If all are prohibited, then the question is flawed.
Let's assume the question is asking which of these activities is not always prohibited, but sometimes allowed. a, b, d are always prohibited. c is prohibited during a specific period. This implies that outside that 5-day period, they can give advice on trading securities. This makes 'c' the only plausible answer, as it describes an activity that is generally permissible, just with specific time-based restrictions.
Therefore, the correct interpretation is that while there's a restriction during the 5-day period, the general act of "giving advice on trading securities" is something an investment contact can do outside of that specific restriction. The other options describe actions that are fundamentally impermissible at all times.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน (Investment Consultant) ไม่สามารถชักชวนให้ลงทุนบ่อยเกินควร (churning), ตัดสินใจซื้อขายแทนโดยไม่ได้รับอนุญาต, หรือจัดหาเงินกู้นอกระบบให้ลูกค้าได้ การให้คำแนะนำเกี่ยวกับหลักทรัพย์ที่บริษัทตนเองเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายหลังปิดการขายไปแล้วจึงเป็นสิ่งที่สามารถทำได้ภายใต้กฎเกณฑ์ เมื่อเทียบกับข้ออื่นซึ่งเป็นการกระทำที่ผิดจรรยาบรรณอย่างชัดเจน
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
This question asks about what a contact person for investors can do. Let's break down the options:
Therefore, the correct answer is c.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
The question asks which activity a person who contacts investors can perform, likely within the context of securities or investment regulations.
Thus, option d is the permissible activity.
{"correct_answer_key":"d"}
asks which action an investor contact person is permitted to perform under securities regulations. Let's evaluate each option:
Thus, only option c aligns with permissible activities for an investor contact person, as it falls within regulated post-offering advisory roles.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
คำอธิบาย:
ตัวเลือกที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฏิบัติได้ คือ การให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย (ข้อ c) ซึ่งเป็นไปตามข้อกำหนดของกฎหมายและระเบียบที่เกี่ยวข้อง ส่วนข้ออื่น ๆ เป็นการกระทำที่ผิดระเบียบหรือกฎหมาย
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
คำถามถามถึงสิ่งที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฏิบัติได้ โดยพิจารณาจากตัวเลือก:
ดังนั้น ตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องคือ c
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
คำถามนี้เกี่ยวกับหน้าที่ของผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน ซึ่งโดยทั่วไปแล้ว หน้าที่นี้คือการให้ข้อมูลและคำแนะนำเกี่ยวกับการลงทุน ไม่ใช่การชักชวนให้ทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครั้ง การรับมอบหมายในการตัดสินใจซื้อขาย หรือสนับสนุนด้านเงินกู้นอกระบบ ซึ่งอาจผิดกฎหมายหรือไม่เหมาะสม
ตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องคือ "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย" ซึ่งเป็นหน้าที่ที่เกี่ยวข้องกับการให้ข้อมูลและคำแนะนำอย่างเป็นทางการ
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
คำถามนี้เกี่ยวข้องกับแนวปฏิบัติที่ถูกต้องของผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน (Investment Consultant หรือ IC) ตามหลักเกณฑ์ของหน่วยงานกำกับดูแลตลาดทุนไทย (เช่น กลต.). ตัวเลือกที่ผิด (a, b, c, d) ล้วนเป็นการกระทำที่ผิดกฎระเบียบหรือผิดจรรยาบรรณในการปฏิบัติหน้าที่ของผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน เช่น:
ดังนั้น ตัวเลือกทั้งหมดข้างต้น (a, b, c, d) เป็นสิ่งที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนไม่สามารถปฏิบัติได้เลย จึงไม่มีตัวเลือกใดที่ถูกต้องตามหลักเกณฑ์ที่กำหนดมาในคำถามนี้
อย่างไรก็ตาม จากโจทย์ที่ให้มา ไม่มีตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องเลย (ทุกตัวเลือกผิดทั้งหมด) ดังนั้นคำตอบที่ถูกต้องคือไม่มีตัวเลือกใดที่สามารถปฏิบัติได้
{"correct_answer_key":null}
ในบริบทของการให้บริการทางการเงินและการลงทุน ผู้ที่ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนควรปฏิบัติตามกฎระเบียบและจรรยาบรรณที่กำหนดไว้ โดยทั่วไปแล้ว การให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขายเป็นสิ่งที่สามารถทำได้ตามกฎระเบียบที่กำหนดไว้
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
คำถามนี้เกี่ยวกับบทบาทของผู้ที่ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนในตลาดหลักทรัพย์ โดยมีตัวเลือกที่เกี่ยวข้องกับการปฏิบัติหน้าที่ที่เหมาะสมและไม่เหมาะสม ตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องจะต้องไม่ขัดต่อกฎระเบียบหรือจริยธรรมในการลงทุน
ดังนั้น ตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องคือ C
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ข้อ ก และ ง เป็นพฤติกรรมที่ขัดต่อหลักเกณฑ์/จรรยาบรรณ (ชักชวนให้ทำธุรกรรมถี่ และจัดหาเงินกู้นอกระบบ) ส่วนข้อ ข เป็นการตัดสินใจแทนลูกค้า ซึ่งไม่ใช่หน้าที่ของผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนตามปกติ จึงเหลือข้อ ค ที่สามารถปฏิบัติได้ตามกรอบที่กำหนด
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ข้อ a ถูกต้อง — ผู้ที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถชักชวนหรือแนะนำการลงทุนได้ แต่ห้ามรับมอบอำนาจตัดสินใจแทนผู้ลงทุน จัดหาเงินกู้นอกระบบ หรือให้คำแนะนำเกี่ยวกับการเสนอขายในช่วงที่กฎหมาย/ข้อบังคับห้าม
{"correct_answer_key":"a"}
ข้ออธิบาย: ข้อ B คือหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถได้มอบอํานาจให้ตัดสินใจซื้อขายแทนผู้ลงทุนได้ แต่ต้องมีข้อตกลงหรืออํานาจจากผู้ลงทุน ส่วนข้อ A, C, D ละเมิดแนวปฏิบัติที่ไม่ควรทำ เช่น ชักชวนให้ทำธุรกรรมบ่อยเกินเหตุ หรือให้คำแนะนำหลังปิดการขายที่ไม่เหมาะสม หรือจัดหาเงินกู้นอกระบบเพื่อการซื้อขาย
{"correct_answer_key":"b"}
The front‑office staff may only give general, non‑personalized market commentary that is publicly disclosed (e.g., a broad recommendation issued by the firm within the allowed time frame). The other actions – urging frequent trades, taking discretionary authority, or arranging off‑system loans – are not permitted.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
The question asks which activity a front‑office contact (someone who interacts directly with investors) is allowed to perform. Under Thai securities regulations, such contacts may not give general investment advice or act as an agent for investors. They also cannot provide external financing. The only exception is that they may give recommendations on securities that are being offered to the public in a broad distribution, provided the company they belong to is the distributor and the recommendation is made within five business days after the sale closes. This is the sole permissible action among the options.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องคือตัวเลือกที่สอดคล้องกับจรรยาบรรณและกฎระ
First, the user has provided a JSON object that seems to be a multiple-choice question, but it's in Thai. I need to understand what this is asking.
The question is: "ตัวเลือกใดต่อไปนี้ที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฏิบัติได้"
Translated to English: "Which of the following options can the person in charge of contacting investors perform?"
The options are:
a: "ชักชวน หรือให้คำแนะนำในลักษณะที่เป็นการสนับสนุนให้ผู้ลงทุนทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครั้ง"
b: "รับมอบหมายจากผู้ลงทุนในการตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนผู้ลงทุน"
c: "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย"
d: "สนับสนุนหรือให้ความช่วยเหลือผู้ลงทุนโดยการจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบให้เพื่อใช้ในการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์"
This appears to be related to securities or investment regulations, possibly in Thailand, given the language.
I need to recall or know what a "ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน" is. In Thai financial regulations, this likely refers to a "salesperson" or "investment contact person" for securities, governed by bodies like the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand).
From my knowledge:
Let me evaluate each option:
a: Encouraging frequent transactions – This might be seen as churning, which is unethical and prohibited as it benefits the broker more than the investor.
b: Making decisions on behalf of the investor – This sounds like discretionary trading, which typically requires specific authorization and is not standard for contact persons without proper licensing.
c: Giving advice on securities that their company distributes, but only after 5 business days – This might be allowed, as there's a cooling-off period to avoid immediate sales pressure.
d: Arranging off-system loans for trading – This could involve illegal or unregulated lending, which is probably not allowed as it promotes risky behavior.
Based on standard regulations:
I should confirm if this is accurate. In many jurisdictions, including Thailand, there are rules about when and how advice can be given, especially for securities issued by the same firm.
Upon double-checking, in Thai SEC regulations, salespersons can provide advice, but with restrictions. Specifically, for new issues, there might be blackout periods.
From what I recall, option C is likely the correct one because the other options involve prohibited activities:
a: Promoting frequent trading is against best interest.
b: Discretionary authority is not typically granted to contact persons without being a portfolio manager.
d: Arranging loans, especially informal ones, could violate anti-money laundering or ethical standards.
So, I believe the correct answer is C.
Now, as per my role, I need to:
Provide a brief explanation.
Respond in JSON with the "correct_answer_key".
Similar to the previous interaction.
Explanation: I'll say something like, "Based on securities regulations, the contact person can provide advice on securities after the specified period, which is option C."
Then, output: {"correct_answer_key":"c"}
Make sure the JSON is correctly formatted.
This question is in Thai and pertains to securities regulations, specifically what a "ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน" (an investment contact person or salesperson under Thai SEC regulations) is allowed to do. Based on standard regulations from the Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand (SEC), such individuals are restricted from actions that could lead to conflicts of interest, unethical practices, or market manipulation.
Thus, the correct option is C.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
First, the user has provided another JSON-formatted multiple-choice question, but it's in Thai. I need to understand the question and the options.
The question is: "ตัวเลือกใดต่อไปนี้ที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฏิบัติได้"
Translated to English: "Which of the following options can the person in charge of contacting investors perform?"
Now, the options:
a: "ชักชวน หรือให้คำแนะนำในลักษณะที่เป็นการสนับสนุนให้ผู้ลงทุนทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครั้ง"
b: "รับมอบหมายจากผู้ลงทุนในการตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนผู้ลงทุน"
c: "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย"
d: "สนับสนุนหรือให้ความช่วยเหลือผู้ลงทุนโดยการจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบให้เพื่อใช้ในการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์"
This seems related to securities laws or regulations, possibly in Thailand, given the language. I need to determine which of these a person in charge of contacting investors (like a broker or financial advisor) is allowed to do.
From my knowledge:
In financial regulations, such as those from the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission), there are strict rules about what brokers can and cannot do.
Option A: Encouraging frequent transactions might be seen as churning, which is unethical and often illegal as it prioritizes the broker's commissions over the client's interest.
Option B: Making decisions on behalf of the investor sounds like discretionary trading, which typically requires specific authorization and is heavily regulated. In many jurisdictions, brokers aren't allowed to do this without proper setup.
Option C: Giving advice on securities that their company is distributing, but only after a certain period. This might be allowed to prevent conflicts of interest, like during the initial offering period.
Option D: Arranging loans for trading could involve margin trading or leveraging, but arranging off-system (informal) loans might be prohibited as it could lead to unregulated lending and increased risk.
I need to recall or infer the correct one based on standard practices. Since this is likely from a Thai context, it might refer to Thai SEC rules.
Upon thinking, in Thailand, under the Securities and Exchange Act, securities representatives have limitations.
They cannot encourage excessive trading (A is probably not allowed).
They cannot make decisions for clients without authorization (B might not be straightforward).
For C, there might be a cooling-off period for advice on securities their firm is involved with.
D: Arranging unofficial loans is likely prohibited to prevent fraud and ensure compliance.
After a quick mental check, I believe Option C is the one that is permissible, as it's about giving advice after the restricted period.
The instruction is: "Given a multiple choice question in JSON format, provide a brief explanation, then respond in JSON with the "correct_answer_key"."
So, I need to:
Provide a brief explanation.
Respond in JSON with {"correct_answer_key": "letter"}
I have to decide the correct answer. Based on my reasoning, I'll go with C, as it seems the most compliant.
Explanation: The correct option is C because it adheres to regulations that allow advice after the specified period, avoiding conflicts of interest.
Final response structure:
First, write a brief explanation.
Then, output the JSON.
This question is in Thai and asks which action a person responsible for contacting investors (such as a securities representative) is allowed to perform under financial regulations, likely from the Thai Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Based on standard securities laws:
The correct answer is C, as it complies with regulations permitting advice post-restricted period.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
คำถามนี้เกี่ยวกับจรรยาบรรณและข้อกำหนดในการปฏิบัติหน้าที่ของผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน โดยตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องควรเป็นการกระทำที่ไม่ขัดต่อกฎระเบียบหรือจริยธรรม ตัวเลือก C กล่าวถึงการให้คำแนะนำเกี่ยวกับหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทของตนเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่าย หลังจาก 5 วันทำการนับจากวันปิดการขาย ซึ่งเป็นการปฏิบัติที่สามารถทำได้ตามข้อกำหนดในหลายกรณี เพราะไม่ใช่การชักชวนหรือให้คำแนะนำในช่วงเวลาที่อาจมีผลประโยชน์ทับซ้อน (เช่น ช่วงการขาย) ตัวเลือกอื่นๆ (A, B, D) เกี่ยวข้องกับการกระทำที่อาจผิดจริยธรรมหรือขัดต่อกฎหมาย เช่น การชักชวนให้ทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครั้ง การตัดสินใจแทนผู้ลงทุน หรือการจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบ
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
The question asks which action an investor contact officer is allowed to perform under Thai SEC regulations. Options A, B, and D are prohibited (encouraging churning, accepting discretionary trading authority without proper licensing, and arranging unregulated loans, respectively). Option C is permitted, as providing individual investment advice on publicly offered securities distributed by their company is allowed after the offering closes (the 5-day period does not violate restrictions, which primarily apply to public research during quiet periods).
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องคือ c เพราะตามกฎเกณฑ์ของ ก.ล.ต. ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างได้ ภายใน 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย โดยบริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่าย ซึ่งไม่ถือเป็นการชักชวนให้ซื้อขายบ่อยครั้งหรือละเมิดหลักเกณฑ์อื่น ๆ
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ตัวเลือกที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฏิบัติได้ คือ การให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย ซึ่งเป็นตัวเลือก c
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
The question is asking which of the following actions can be performed by the person responsible for contacting investors.
Let's analyze the options:
The correct action that can be performed is receiving authorization from investors to make investment decisions on their behalf.
{"correct_answer_key":"b"}
To determine the correct answer, let's analyze each option given in the context of what a ผู้ทําหน้าทีติดต่อผู้ลงทุน (a person acting as a contact or intermediary for investors) can do:
Option A: "ชักชวน หรือให้คําแนะนําในลักษณะทีเป็นการสนับสนุนให้ผู้ลงทุนทําธุรกรรมบ่อยครัง" translates to encouraging or advising in a manner that supports frequent transactions. This is generally not allowed as it can be seen as a form of solicitation or encouragement that might not be in the best interest of the investor.
Option B: "รับมอบหมายจากผู้ลงทุนในการตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนผู้ลงทุน" translates to taking on the responsibility from the investor to make decisions on buying or selling securities on their behalf. This is typically not allowed as it crosses into the realm of asset management or portfolio management which requires specific licenses and fiduciary duties.
Option C: "ให้คําแนะนําการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ทีเสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างทีบริษัททีตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจําหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทําการหลังวันปิดการขาย" translates to providing advice on buying or selling securities that are being offered to the public by a company that is also involved in the distribution of those securities within 5 business days after the closing of sales. This seems like a reasonable action that can be taken, especially if the advice is unbiased and part of the normal operations of a firm involved in selling securities.
Option D: "สนับสนุนหรือให้ความช่วยเหลือผู้ลงทุนโดยการจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบให้เพื่อใช้ในการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์" translates to supporting or providing assistance to investors by arranging for non-systematic or off-market funding sources for securities transactions. This can be seen as problematic as it might encourage or facilitate risky behaviors or violate financial regulations.
Given the context and common practices in financial services, providing general investment advice or information (especially if it's related to a public offering) seems more acceptable than the other options which either seem too promotional, advisory without a license, or crossing into illegal financial practices.
The correct choice seems to be providing information or advice related to a public offering within a certain timeframe after the sale has closed.
Therefore, based on standard practices and regulations around financial advising and sales:
{"correct_answer_key": "c"}
The question asks which action a broker (ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน) can legally perform. According to financial regulations, brokers are generally allowed to provide advice and support to investors but cannot make decisions on their behalf without proper authorization.
Option B suggests that the broker can make buy/sell decisions on behalf of the investor, which is typically not allowed unless specifically authorized. Option A involves encouraging frequent trading, which might not be ethical or permissible. Option D involves arranging non-system loans for the investor, which is also not permissible.
Option C, however, involves providing advice on publicly offered securities within a specific time frame, which is a standard and permissible action for a broker.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ตามกฎหมายและข้อบังคับที่เกี่ยวข้องกับผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน ตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องคือตัวเลือก C ซึ่งกล่าวถึงการให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างโดยบริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย ซึ่งเป็นการปฎิบัติที่ถูกต้องตามกฎหมาย
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ในบทความนี้, เราจะพิจารณาว่าผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฎิบัติได้อย่างไรโดยไม่ละเมิดข้อบังคับที่เกี่ยวข้องกับการตลาดหลักทรัพย์.
ตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องคือตัวเลือกที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฎิบัติได้โดยไม่ละเมิดข้อบังคับ:
a "ชักชวน หรือให้คำแนะนำในลักษณะที่เป็นการสนับสนุนให้ผู้ลงทุนทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครัง" - ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถให้คำแนะนำหรือชักชวนผู้ลงทุนทำธุรกรรมแต่ไม่ควรเป็นการบังคับหรือชักชวนให้ทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครังโดยไม่มีการพิจารณาจากผู้ลงทุนเอง.
ตัวเลือกที่ไม่ถูกต้อง:
b "รับมอบหมายจากผู้ลงทุนในการตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนผู้ลงทุน" - ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนไม่สามารถรับมอบหมายจากผู้ลงทุนในการตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนผู้ลงทุนได้ เนื่องจากการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์เป็นเรื่องที่ผู้ลงทุนตัดสินใจเองโดยตรง.
c "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย" - ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนไม่ควรให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ในช่วงเวลาที่ห้ามขายหรือซื้อหลักทรัพย์ได้.
d "สนับสนุนหรือให้ความช่วยเหลือผู้ลงทุนโดยการจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบให้เพื่อใช้ในการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์" - ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนไม่ควรจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบเพื่อใช้ในการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์เนื่องจากเป็นการละเมิดข้อบังคับ.
ดังนั้นตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องคือ:
{"correct_answer_key":"a"}
ในบริบทของการปฎิบัติหน้าที่ในฐานะผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน (client contact person) ตัวเลือกที่เหมาะสมที่สุดคือตัวเลือกที่ไม่ละเมิดกฎหมายหรือข้อบังคับที่เกี่ยวข้องกับการลงทุนและการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ โดยทั่วไปแล้ว ผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถให้คำแนะนำและสนับสนุนผู้ลงทุนในทิศทางที่ถูกต้องตามกฎหมายได้ แต่ไม่สามารถรับมอบหมายให้ตัดสินใจซื้อขายแทนผู้ลงทุนหรือจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบได้
ตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องคือตัวเลือกที่ผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถให้คำแนะนำในลักษณะที่เป็นการสนับสนุนให้ผู้ลงทุนทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครั้ง ซึ่งเป็นการกระตุ้นให้ผู้ลงทุนมีการเข้าถึงตลาดและทำธุรกรรมได้อย่างถูกต้องตามกฎหมาย
{"correct_answer_key":"a"}
คำอธิบายโดยย่อ:
โดยทั่วไปแล้ว การปฏิบัติหน้าที่ของผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนจะต้องอยู่ภายใต้กรอบจรรยาบรรณและกฎเกณฑ์ที่ควบคุม เช่น ห้ามชักชวนให้ลูกค้าทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครั้งเกินความจำเป็น (ข้อ a) ห้ามตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนลูกค้า (ข้อ b) และห้ามจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบให้ลูกค้า (ข้อ d) ส่วนการให้คำแนะนำเกี่ยวกับหลักทรัพย์ที่บริษัทตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายภายในช่วงเวลาที่กำหนด (ข้อ c) สามารถกระทำได้ภายใต้ข้อบังคับที่เกี่ยวข้อง
ดังนั้น ตัวเลือกที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฏิบัติได้คือ:
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ข้อ ก, ข และ ง เป็นสิ่งที่ประกาศ ก.ล.ต. ห้ามโดยชัดเจน
– ก) การกระตุ้นให้ลูกค้าซื้อ‑ขายถี่ ๆ (churning)
– ข) รับอำนาจตัดสินใจแทนลูกค้า (discretionary account)
– ง) จัดหาเงินกู้นอกระบบให้ลูกค้า
ส่วนข้อ ค) หลังปิดการขายหลักทรัพย์ต่อประชาชนแล้ว ผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถให้คำแนะนำเกี่ยวกับการซื้อ‑ขายหลักทรัพย์นั้นได้ เพราะช่วงเสนอขายได้สิ้นสุดลง จึงไม่อยู่ในช่วงห้ามตามกฎเกณฑ์
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน (Investment Consultant / IC) ตามประกาศ ก.ล.ต. อาจกระตุ้นหรือชักชวนให้ลูกค้าซื้อขายบ่อยได้ ตราบใดที่ยังอยู่ภายใต้หลักความเหมาะสม (suitability) และไม่มีเจตนาชาร์จค่าคอมมิชชันเกินควร แต่การ
• รับมอบอำนาจตัดสินใจซื้อขายแทนลูกค้า (ข้อ b) เป็น “บัญชีดิสเครชันนารี” ซึ่ง IC ไม่ได้รับอนุญาต
• ให้คำแนะนำหุ้นที่ตนเองเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายภายใน 5 วันทำการหลังปิดการขาย (ข้อ c) ถูกห้ามช่วง “quiet period”
• จัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบ (ข้อ d) ผิดกฎอย่างชัดเจน
จึงเหลือเพียงข้อ a ที่สามารถทำได้ภายใต้กติกา
{"correct_answer_key":"a"}
คำอธิบายย่อ
– (a) การกระตุ้นให้ลูกค้าซื้อ‐ขายบ่อยครั้งไม่ถูกห้ามโดยกฎเกณฑ์ หากยังคงปฏิบัติตามหลัก Suitability และเปิดเผยค่าธรรมเนียมอย่างโปร่งใส จึง “ทำได้”
– (b) รับมอบอำนาจตัดสินใจซื้อขายแทนลูกค้าเป็นการทำหน้าที่แบบ Discretionary ซึ่งบุคลากรผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน (Investment Consultant) ไม่มีสิทธิทำ
– (c) กฎ ก.ล.ต. ห้ามให้คำแนะนำซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่บริษัทตนเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายภายใน 5 วันทำการหลังปิดการขาย
– (d) การจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบให้ลูกค้าเพื่อลงทุนเป็นการส่งเสริมการกู้ยืมผิดกฎหมาย ผิดจรรยาบรรณอย่างชัดเจน
ดังนั้น ข้อที่ทำได้คือข้อ (a)
{"correct_answer_key":"a"}
Option (c) is the action that an investor relations officer is permitted to perform. Such officers are generally not allowed to encourage frequent trading (as in option a), make direct trading decisions on behalf of investors (as in option b), or assist investors in obtaining unofficial financing for trading (as in option d). However, they are allowed to provide guidance on buying and selling the company’s own securities offered to the public, within a specific period—namely, within 5 business days after the closing day of the offering.
{"correct_answer_key": "c"}
Explanation: Option c is correct. A person acting as an investor contact officer is limited to providing general information and advice in specific situations. In this case, offering guidance on publicly offered securities handled by their own company during the five business days after the closing of the sale falls within their permitted functions. The other options involve activities—such as encouraging frequent transactions, making trading decisions on behalf of investors, or arranging unregulated financing—that exceed the authorized scope for this role.
{"correct_answer_key": "c"}
Option c is the one that falls within the permissible activities. In this instance, providing advice on securities being offered to the public—in which the company the contact person belongs to is the distributor—within the designated period (5 business days after the closing date) is allowed for a person whose role is to interact with investors. The other options involve either inducing frequent transactions, acting on behalf of investors in decision-making, or facilitating non-systematic loan arrangements, which exceed the authorized scope of the investor contact person.
{"correct_answer_key": "c"}
ตัวเลือก (c) เพราะเจ้าหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถให้ข้อมูลหรือคำแนะนำเพื่ออำนวยความสะดวกในการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เพิ่งเสนอขายต่อประชาชนในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังปิดการขาย ซึ่งเป็นการให้บริการตามบทบาทที่กำหนด
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ตัวเลือก b, c และ d เป็นการกระทำที่ผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนไม่มีอำนาจ (เช่น การตัดสินใจแทนลูกค้า การแนะนำระหว่างช่วง lock‑up หรือจัดหาเงินกู้นอกระบบ) ขณะที่การ “ชักชวนหรือให้คำแนะนำในลักษณะที่สนับสนุนให้ผู้ลงทุนทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครั้ง” ถือเป็นการขายหรือแนะนำตามหน้าที่ของผู้ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน โดยไม่ได้ขัดกับข้อบังคับโดยตรง
{"correct_answer_key":"a"}
คำอธิบาย: เจ้าหน้าที่ที่ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถให้คำแนะนำเกี่ยวกับการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่บริษัทเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายได้ ภายใน 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย ส่วนตัวเลือกอื่นเป็นการชักชวนให้เทรดบ่อย ทำธุรกรรมแทนผู้ลงทุน หรือจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบ ซึ่งไม่อนุญาต
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ในการติดต่อผู้ลงทุน ผู้ที่ติดต่อต้องปฏิบัติตามกฎระเบียบที่เข้มงวดเพื่อปกป้องผู้ลงทุนและรักษาความโปร่งใสในตลาดหลักทรัพย์ ตัวเลือกที่ผู้ที่ติดต่อสามารถปฏิบัติได้คือ:
ตัวเลือกอื่น ๆ ไม่ได้รับอนุญาตเนื่องจากอาจนำไปสู่การปฏิบัติที่ไม่เป็นธรรมหรือการละเมิดกฎระเบียบ:
ดังนั้น ตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องคือ:
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ในตัวเลือกที่ให้มา ตัวเลือกที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฏิบัติได้จริงภายใต้กรอบของกฎหมายและจรรยาบรรณในการปฏิบัติงานในตลาดหลักทรัพย์ คือ:
ตัวเลือก c: "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย"
แม้ว่าจะต้องปฏิบัติภายใต้ข้อกำหนดและเงื่อนไข โดยคำแนะนำที่ให้ต้องไม่เป็นการชักจูงหรือกระตุ้นเกินจริง และต้องอยู่บนพื้นฐานของข้อมูลที่ถูกต้องครบถ้วน
ตัวเลือกที่เหลือ มีลักษณะที่อาจขัดต่อจรรยาบรรณหรือกฎหมาย เช่น:
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
คำถามนี้ตรวจสอบความรู้เกี่ยวกับข้อกำหนดทางจริยธรรมหรือกฎหมายในการปฏิบัติงานที่เกี่ยวข้องกับนักลงทุน โดยตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องคือ ตัวเลือก c เนื่องจาก:
ดังนั้น ตัวเลือก c จึงเป็นคำตอบที่ถูกต้อง
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
The question asks which action an investor relations officer is permitted to perform.
Correct Answer: c
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ผู้ที่ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุน (Investor Relations Officer หรือ Representative) ต้องปฏิบัติงานตามกฎหมายและจริยธรรมของตลาดทุน โดยต้องไม่กระทำที่อาจก่อให้เกิดความขัดแย้งทางผลประโยชน์ หรือส่งเสริมการซื้อขายที่ไม่เหมาะสม
พิจารณาตัวเลือก:
ดังนั้น ตัวเลือกที่ถูกต้องคือ c
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
Okay, let's see. I need to figure out which of the options a, b, c, or d is the correct answer for the question about what an investor relations officer can do. The question is in Thai, so I should translate it first to understand properly.
The question says: "ตัวเลือกใดต่อไปนี้ทีผู้ทําหน้าทีติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฎิบัติได้" which translates to "Which of the following actions can an investor relations officer perform?"
Now looking at the options:
a) "ชักชวน หรือให้คําแนะนําในลักษณะทีเป็นการสนับสนุนให้ผู้ลงทุนทําธุรกรรมบ่อยครัง" – This means "Encouraging or advising in a way that supports investors to make frequent transactions."
b) "รับมอบหมายจากผู้ลงทุนในการตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนผู้ลงทุน" – "Receiving authorization from investors to make buy/sell decisions on their behalf."
c) "ให้คําแนะนําการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ทีเสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างทีบริษัททีตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจําหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทําการหลังวันปิดการขาย" – "Providing investment advice for securities offered to the public where the company they work for is the underwriter during the 5 business days after the closing of the offering."
d) "สนับสนุนหรือให้ความช่วยเหลือผู้ลงทุนโดยการจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบให้เพื่อใช้ในการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์" – "Supporting or assisting investors by providing access to informal lending sources for buying/selling securities."
Now, I need to recall the regulations regarding investor relations officers in Thailand. Investor relations officers typically handle communication between the company and investors, providing information about the company's performance, financials, etc. But they have to follow certain rules to avoid conflicts of interest or illegal activities.
Option a: Encouraging frequent transactions. That might be considered as promoting excessive trading, which could be against regulations because it might lead to unnecessary commissions or manipulation. So probably not allowed.
Option b: Acting on behalf of investors to make decisions. That sounds like a portfolio manager or a broker with power of attorney. Investor relations officers usually don't have the authority to make trading decisions for clients; that's more for investment advisors or brokers. So maybe not allowed.
Option c: Providing advice on securities offered to the public where their company is the underwriter during the 5 business days after closing. In Thailand, there's a cooling-off period after a securities offering. During this time, underwriters might have restrictions on promoting the securities. But I think there's a specific rule about not giving advice during certain periods. Wait, maybe after the offering closes, there's a period where they can't promote it. Alternatively, maybe they are allowed to provide information but not advice. Wait, the option says "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขาย" which is providing buy/sell advice. If the company is the underwriter, during the 5 business days after closing, there might be restrictions. In some jurisdictions, there's a quiet period where underwriters can't issue research reports or recommendations. For example, in the US, there's a 25-day quiet period for IPOs. But in Thailand, maybe similar rules apply. If the company is the underwriter, during the 5 days after closing, they might not be allowed to give advice on that security. So option c might be prohibited.
Option d: Providing informal loans for trading. That's definitely not allowed. Getting involved in lending, especially informal (non-system) loans, could be illegal. Investor relations officers shouldn't be involved in financing clients' trades through unofficial channels. That's probably a violation.
Wait, but the question is asking which action they CAN do. So the correct answer is the one that's permitted.
Let me think again. Investor relations officers are supposed to provide accurate information about the company, but not give personalized investment advice. They shouldn't encourage frequent trading (option a), as that could be seen as promoting speculation. Option b: acting on behalf of investors to make decisions – that's more like a discretionary account, which requires specific licenses. Investor relations officers typically don't have that authority. Option d is clearly wrong because providing informal loans is illegal.
Option c: providing advice on securities offered to the public where their company is the underwriter during the 5 business days after closing. Wait, in Thailand, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations might have specific rules. For example, after a public offering, there's a period where the underwriter can't issue recommendations. But maybe during that time, they are allowed to provide information but not advice. Alternatively, maybe the rule is that during the 5 days after closing, they can't give advice. If option c says they are providing advice during that period, then it's prohibited. But if the question is which action they CAN do, then maybe none of them except one.
Wait, maybe option c is actually allowed? Let me check. In Thailand, under the Securities and Exchange Act, there's a rule that during the period after the offering, the underwriter may not issue recommendations. For example, in the case of an IPO, there's a quiet period where the underwriter can't publish research or recommendations. So if the company is the underwriter, during the 5 business days after closing, they shouldn't be giving advice. So option c would be prohibited.
But then which option is allowed? Maybe none of them except one. Wait, perhaps option c is actually allowed? Or maybe I'm misunderstanding.
Alternatively, maybe option c is correct. Let me think again. The question is which action can they do. So the correct answer is the one that's permitted.
Wait, maybe option c is allowed. Let's see: "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย"
So the company they work for is the underwriter (ผู้จัดจำหน่าย), and they are giving advice during the 5 business days after closing. In Thailand, the SEC regulations might have a rule that during the period after the offering, the underwriter can't issue recommendations. For example, in the US, the quiet period is 25 days after IPO. In Thailand, maybe similar. So if they are giving advice during that time, it's prohibited. So option c is not allowed.
Then what's allowed? Let's check the options again.
Option a: encouraging frequent transactions – probably not allowed, as it's considered inappropriate solicitation.
Option b: acting on behalf of investors to make decisions – that's a broker-dealer function, which requires a license. Investor relations officers typically don't have that role. So probably not allowed.
Option d: providing informal loans – definitely illegal.
So maybe none of the options are correct? But that can't be. The question must have one correct answer.
Wait, perhaps I'm misunderstanding the role of an investor relations officer. In Thailand, the investor relations officer (IR officer) is part of the company's management, responsible for communicating with investors, providing information about the company's performance, financials, etc. They are not supposed to give investment advice. However, they can provide factual information about the company.
But looking at the options:
Option c: providing advice on securities offered to the public where their company is the underwriter during the 5 days after closing. If the company is the underwriter, then during the offering period, there are restrictions. But after closing, maybe they can provide information. However, giving advice might still be restricted.
Alternatively, maybe option c is allowed. Wait, in Thailand, the SEC has rules about when underwriters can issue research reports. For example, after the IPO, there's a quiet period where they can't publish research. But maybe the 5 days after closing is part of that. So if they are giving advice during that time, it's prohibited. So option c is not allowed.
Hmm. Maybe the correct answer is none of the above, but since the options are given, perhaps one of them is correct.
Wait, maybe option c is actually allowed. Let me check Thai regulations. In Thailand, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has regulations regarding the underwriting process. According to the SEC rules, after the closing of a public offering, there is a period during which the underwriter is restricted from publishing research or recommendations. For example, in the case of an IPO, the quiet period is typically 25 days after the offering. However, the option says "5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย" which is 5 business days after closing. If the regulation says that during this period, they cannot give advice, then option c is prohibited.
But maybe the correct answer is option c? Or perhaps not. Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c because the rule is that during the 5 days after closing, they can provide information but not advice. Wait, but the option says "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขาย" which is providing advice. So if the regulation prohibits that during that period, then option c is not allowed.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Wait, perhaps the rule is that during the 5 days after closing, the underwriter can provide information but not advice. So if the option says they are giving advice, then it's prohibited. So option c is not allowed.
Then what's allowed? Let's think again. Maybe none of the options except one. Let's check each option again.
Option a: encouraging frequent transactions – this is likely prohibited because it's considered as promoting excessive trading, which could be a violation of securities laws.
Option b: acting on behalf of investors to make decisions – this would require a license as a securities broker or investment advisor. Investor relations officers typically don't have that authority, so this is not allowed.
Option d: providing informal loans – definitely illegal, as it's outside the regulated financial system.
So all options seem prohibited. But that can't be. The question must have a correct answer. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the role of the investor relations officer.
Wait, perhaps in Thailand, the investor relations officer is allowed to provide information about the company's securities, but not personalized advice. However, option c says "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย"
If the company is the underwriter, then during the 5 days after closing, they might be allowed to provide information but not advice. But if the option says "ให้คำแนะนำ" which is advice, then it's prohibited. So option c is not allowed.
Wait, maybe the correct answer is option c. Let me check Thai regulations. According to the Thai SEC, under the rules for underwriters, there is a quiet period after the offering where they cannot issue research reports or recommendations. For example, in Thailand, the quiet period for IPOs is 25 days after the offering. So during that time, they can't give advice. So option c says during 5 business days after closing, which is within the quiet period, so giving advice is prohibited. So option c is not allowed.
Then what's the correct answer? Maybe none of the options, but since the question is multiple choice, perhaps there's a mistake. Alternatively, maybe option c is allowed. Wait, perhaps the rule is different. Let me think.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Because in some cases, after the offering closes, the underwriter can provide information. But the question is about "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขาย" which is advice. If the company is the underwriter, during the 5 days after closing, they might be allowed to provide information but not advice. So option c is prohibited.
Hmm. Maybe the correct answer is none of the above, but since the options are given, perhaps the intended answer is c. Or maybe I'm missing something.
Wait, another angle: investor relations officers are part of the company, not the underwriter. If the company is the issuer, and the underwriter is a different entity. But the option says "บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่าย" which means the company they work for is the underwriter (ผู้จัดจำหน่าย). So if they are part of the underwriting firm, then during the quiet period, they can't give advice. So option c is prohibited.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Let's see. In Thailand, the SEC has rules that after the offering, the underwriter can issue research reports after a certain period. For example, in some cases, the quiet period is 25 days, but maybe for certain offerings, it's shorter. But the option says 5 business days. If the regulation allows it after 5 days, then option c would be allowed. But I'm not sure.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Because in some cases, after the closing of the offering, the underwriter can provide information. But I'm not certain.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Let's think about it. If the company is the underwriter, then during the 5 days after closing, they might be allowed to provide advice. But I'm not sure.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Because in Thailand, the rule might be that after the offering closes, the underwriter can provide information but not advice. But the option says "ให้คำแนะนำ" which is advice, so it's prohibited. So option c is not allowed.
Wait, perhaps the correct answer is none of the options, but since the question is given, maybe the intended answer is c. Or maybe I'm missing something.
Alternatively, maybe option c is allowed. Let's check the Thai SEC regulations. According to the Thai Securities and Exchange Commission, under the rules for underwriters, there is a quiet period of 25 days after the offering where the underwriter cannot issue research reports or recommendations. So during the 5 business days after closing, which is within the 25-day period, they cannot give advice. So option c is prohibited.
So all options seem prohibited. But that can't be. Maybe the question is about what they CAN do, so the correct answer is none of the above, but since the options are given, perhaps there's a mistake. Alternatively, maybe option c is allowed.
Wait, another thought: maybe the question is about "ผู้ทําหน้าทีติดต่อผู้ลงทุน" which is investor relations officer, but in Thai context, the investor relations officer is part of the company (issuer), not the underwriter. So if the company is the issuer, and the underwriter is a different entity. But option c says "บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่าย" which means the company they work for is the underwriter. So if the investor relations officer works for the underwriter, then during the quiet period, they can't give advice. So option c is prohibited.
But if the investor relations officer works for the issuer (the company issuing the securities), then they might be allowed to provide information about their own company. But option c says "บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่าย" which means the company is the underwriter, not the issuer. So if the IR officer works for the underwriter, then during the quiet period, they can't give advice.
Hmm. This is getting complicated. Maybe the correct answer is option c. Because in some cases, after the offering closes, the underwriter can provide information. But I'm not sure.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Let's see. In Thailand, the SEC has rules that after the offering closes, the underwriter can issue research reports after a certain period. For example, for IPOs, the quiet period is 25 days, but for other offerings, maybe it's different. If the option says 5 business days after closing, which is less than 25 days, then it's still within the quiet period, so prohibited.
So option c is prohibited.
Then what's allowed? Let's check option a again: encouraging frequent transactions. That's probably prohibited because it's considered as promoting excessive trading, which could be a violation of the Securities and Exchange Act.
Option b: acting on behalf of investors to make decisions. That requires a license as a securities broker or investment advisor. Investor relations officers typically don't have that authority, so it's prohibited.
Option d: providing informal loans – definitely illegal.
So all options are prohibited. But that can't be. The question must have a correct answer. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the role of the investor relations officer.
Wait, maybe the correct answer is option c. Because in some cases, after the offering closes, the underwriter can provide information. But the option says "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขาย" which is advice. If the regulation allows providing information but not advice, then option c is prohibited. But maybe in Thai regulations, there's a specific rule that allows it.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Let me think of another angle. In Thailand, when a company is offering securities to the public, the underwriter (ผู้จัดจำหน่าย) is responsible for the offering. After the offering closes, there's a period where they can't issue recommendations. But maybe during the 5 days after closing, they are allowed to provide information. However, "ให้คำแนะนำ" is advice, which is different from providing information. So if the option says "ให้คำแนะนำ" then it's prohibited.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Because in some cases, after the offering closes, the underwriter can provide advice. But I'm not sure.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Let's check online. Since I can't actually look it up, but based on general knowledge.
In many jurisdictions, underwriters have a quiet period after an IPO where they can't publish research or recommendations. For example, in the US, it's 25 days. In Thailand, it's likely similar. So during the 5 business days after closing, which is within the quiet period, they can't give advice. So option c is prohibited.
So all options are prohibited. But the question must have a correct answer. Maybe the intended answer is option c, but I'm not sure.
Alternatively, maybe option c is allowed. Let's think: "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย"
If the company is the underwriter, and they are providing advice during the 5 days after closing. Maybe in Thailand, the rule is that after the offering closes, they can provide advice. But I'm not sure.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Because in some cases, after the offering closes, the underwriter can provide information. But the question is about advice.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Because the regulation might allow it. For example, in Thailand, the SEC might have specific rules where after the closing, the underwriter can provide advice after 5 days. But I'm not certain.
Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is option c. Because the other options are clearly wrong. Option a is encouraging frequent trading, which is bad. Option b is acting on behalf of investors, which requires a license. Option d is illegal lending. So option c might be the only possible correct answer, even if I'm not sure about the details.
So perhaps the correct answer is c.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
Okay, let's tackle this question. It's in Thai, so I need to make sure I understand it properly. The question is asking which of the options is something that a person responsible for contacting investors can do. The options are a, b, c, d.
First, I'll translate the question and options to get a clear idea. The main question is about the permissible actions for someone who is in contact with investors, probably in a financial or securities context.
Looking at the options:
Option a: "ชักชวน หรือให้คำแนะนำในลักษณะที่เป็นการสนับสนุนให้ผู้ลงทุนทำธุรกรรมบ่อยครั้ง" translates to something like "Inducing or giving advice that encourages investors to conduct transactions frequently." That sounds like it might be problematic because encouraging frequent trading could be seen as pushing for more trades than necessary, possibly for the advisor's benefit, which might be against regulations. Many regulations prohibit churning or excessive trading that's not in the investor's best interest.
Option b: "รับมอบหมายจากผู้ลงทุนในการตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนผู้ลงทุน" which means "Being authorized by the investor to make buying/selling decisions on their behalf." This sounds like acting as a discretionary trader or having power of attorney. However, typically, such actions require specific permissions and might not be something the contact person can do without proper authorization. Maybe this is allowed if they have the proper mandate, but I need to check the other options.
Option c: "ให้คำแนะนำการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ที่เสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างที่บริษัทที่ตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจำหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทำการหลังวันปิดการขาย" translates to "Giving advice on buying/selling securities that are publicly offered on a wide scale, where the company they belong to is the distributor during the 5 business days after the closing sale day." This might relate to a cooling-off period. In some regulations, there are restrictions on recommendations after a public offering. For example, after an IPO, there might be a lock-up period where the underwriter can't give recommendations. But here it's 5 days after closing. Maybe this is allowed if the company is the distributor, so they can provide advice during that period. Not sure yet.
Option d: "สนับสนุนหรือให้ความช่วยเหลือผู้ลงทุนโดยการจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบให้เพื่อใช้ในการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์" which means "Supporting or helping investors by arranging non-bank loan sources for use in securities trading." This sounds like facilitating loans outside the banking system for investing. That's probably not allowed because it could be promoting risky leverage or unregulated loans, which is against regulations to prevent investors from taking on excessive debt through unofficial channels.
Now, considering Thai securities regulations. In Thailand, the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) has strict rules for financial advisors and those dealing with investors.
Option a: Encouraging frequent trading might be seen as churning, which is prohibited. Advisors must act in the investor's best interest, not push for more transactions for commissions.
Option b: If the person is authorized by the investor, that's allowed, but the question is about what the contact person can do. However, acting on behalf might require specific licensing or permissions beyond just being a contact person. Maybe this is not allowed unless they have the proper discretionary authority, which might not be standard.
Option c: If the company they work for is the distributor of the security, giving advice during the 5 days after the closing sale. Maybe this is allowed because they are part of the distribution process. However, there might be a quiet period or restrictions post-offering. For example, after a public offering, underwriters might have a period where they can't give recommendations. But if the 5 days are after the closing, perhaps this is permitted. Alternatively, maybe the regulation allows it because they are the distributor and can provide information during that period.
Option d: Non-bank loans for trading is likely prohibited. Brokers can't arrange loans for investors, especially non-bank ones, as that could be seen as promoting excessive leverage or unsecured loans, which is risky and against regulations.
So, the most plausible correct answer is option c. The key here is that the advisor is part of the company distributing the security and can provide advice during the specified period. The other options either involve prohibited actions (a and d) or require specific authorization that might not be standard (b).
The question asks which action is permissible for someone responsible for contacting investors. Here's the breakdown:
The correct answer is c, as it adheres to regulations allowing advice during the specified period for securities their company distributes.
{"correct_answer_key":"c"}
ตัวเลือกที่ผู้ทำหน้าที่ติดต่อผู้ลงทุนสามารถปฏิบัติได้คือ "รับมอบหมายจากผู้ลงทุนในการตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนผู้ลงทุน" ซึ่งตรงกับตัวเลือก B
{"correct_answer_key":"b"}
Alright! Let's tackle this question. The user provided a multiple-choice question in Thai about appropriate actions for someone who contacts investors. The options are labeled a to d. I need to figure out which one is correct.
First, I'll translate each option to understand what they're saying.
Option a: "ชักชวน หรือให้คําแนะนําในลักษณะทีเป็นการสนับสนุนให้ผู้ลงทุนทําธุรกรรมบ่อยครัง" translates to "Encourage or advise in a way that supports frequent transactions by investors." This sounds like it might be problematic because encouraging excessive trading could be against regulations if it's not in the investor's best interest.
Option b: "รับมอบหมายจากผู้ลงทุนในการตัดสินใจซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์แทนผู้ลงทุน" means "Receive an assignment from the investor to make buy/sell decisions on their behalf." This seems like a standard practice where an investor gives a broker authority to act on their behalf, which is usually permissible.
Option c: "ให้คําแนะนําการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์ทีเสนอขายต่อประชาชนในวงกว้างทีบริษัททีตนสังกัดเป็นผู้จัดจําหน่ายในช่วง 5 วันทําการหลังวันปิดการขาย" translates to "Provide advice on trading securities that are publicly offered, where the company one works for is the underwriter, within 5 business days after the closing date." This might be restricted due to quiet periods or cooling-off periods to prevent insider trading or undue influence.
Option d: "สนับสนุนหรือให้ความช่วยเหลือผู้ลงทุนโดยการจัดหาแหล่งเงินกู้นอกระบบให้เพื่อใช้ในการซื้อขายหลักทรัพย์" means "Support or assist investors by arranging informal loan sources for trading." This is likely illegal as it involves un regulated lending practices, which can be risky and against financial regulations.
Now, considering each option in light of financial regulations:
Therefore, the correct answer should be option b, as it's the only one that describes a permissible action under standard financial regulations.
{
  "correct_answer_key": "b"
}
This question asks about what a securities salesperson can do. Let's analyze each option:
Therefore, the correct answer is the one that aligns with ethical and legal practices for a securities salesperson.
{"correct_answer_key":"a"}